Product comparison · 2 rice cookers

Philips HD3064/35 rice cooker vs Philips 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 9identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker has 1.26 L more volume than the Philips HD3064/35 rice cooker (1.8 L vs 0.54 L). The Philips 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker has 200 W more power than the Philips HD3064/35 rice cooker (600 W vs 400 W). The Philips 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker has 59 mm more width than the Philips HD3064/35 rice cooker (275 mm vs 216 mm). Only the Philips HD3064/35 rice cooker has built-in display. Product colour: White, Pink on the Philips HD3064/35 rice cooker, Green, White on the Philips 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker.

  • Product colour
    • HD3064/35 rice cooker:White, Pink
    • 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker:Green, White
  • Volume
    • HD3064/35 rice cooker:0.54 L
    • 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker:1.8 L
  • Built-in display
    • HD3064/35 rice cooker:Yes
    • 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker:No
  • Power
    • HD3064/35 rice cooker:400 W
    • 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker:600 W
  • AC input frequency
    • HD3064/35 rice cooker:50 Hz
    • 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker:50-60 Hz
  • AC input voltage
    • HD3064/35 rice cooker:220-240 V
    • 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker:220 V
  • Width
    • HD3064/35 rice cooker:216 mm
    • 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker:275 mm
  • Depth
    • HD3064/35 rice cooker:243 mm
    • 3000 series HD3212/32 rice cooker:305 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of HD3064/35, HD3212/32
40 specifications
A

Philips

HD3064/35 rice cooker

Model HD3064/35

View product
Features3 differ
Product colourDiffersWhite, PinkGreen, White
VolumeDiffers0.54 L1.8 L
Steam cookingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Non-stick coatingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Built-in displayDiffersYesNo
Keep warm functionYesYes
Control typeButtonsButtons
Cord length0.8 m0.8 m
Detachable lidYesYes
Handle(s)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Housing materialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePlastic
Non-slip feetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Removable bowlYesYes
Number of cooking programsKnown for one5Unknown — not stated by the source
Keep warm function timeKnown for one12 hUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Detachable and washable inner lidKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Easy-to-clean non-stick inner potKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Fuzzy Logic controlsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
PowerDiffers400 W600 W
AC input frequencyDiffers50 Hz50-60 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers220-240 V220 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers216 mm275 mm
DepthDiffers243 mm305 mm
HeightDiffers190 mm300 mm
WeightDiffers2.2 kg3.19 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source326 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source348 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source348 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.62 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Measuring cupYesYes
Recipe bookKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Spoon includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Steaming basketKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
SpatulaKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originChinaChina
Warranty period2 year(s)2 year(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsNoNo
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one90%Unknown — not stated by the source
User manual recycled paperKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rice cooker comparisons

All rice cooker comparisons