Product comparison · 2 rice cookers

Philips Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker vs Philips HD3170/62 rice cooker

16specifications compared
7differ
9identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker has 0.4 m more cord length than the Philips HD3170/62 rice cooker (1.2 m vs 0.8 m). The Philips HD3170/62 rice cooker has 200 W more power than the Philips Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker (600 W vs 400 W). The Philips Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker has 12 mm more width than the Philips HD3170/62 rice cooker (252 mm vs 240 mm). Product colour: Green, White on the Philips Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker, White, Stainless steel on the Philips HD3170/62 rice cooker. AC input voltage: 220 V on the Philips Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker, 220-240 V on the Philips HD3170/62 rice cooker.

Product colour
- Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker:Green, White
- HD3170/62 rice cooker:White, Stainless steel
Cord length
- Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker:1.2 m
- HD3170/62 rice cooker:0.8 m
Power
- Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker:400 W
- HD3170/62 rice cooker:600 W
AC input voltage
- Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker:220 V
- HD3170/62 rice cooker:220-240 V
Width
- Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker:252 mm
- HD3170/62 rice cooker:240 mm
Depth
- Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker:252 mm
- HD3170/62 rice cooker:338 mm
Height
- Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker:232 mm
- HD3170/62 rice cooker:210 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of HD3011/30, HD3170/62
37 specifications	A Philips Daily Collection HD3011/30 rice cooker Model HD3011/30 View product	B Philips HD3170/62 rice cooker Model HD3170/62 View product
Features2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Green, White	White, Stainless steel
VolumeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.85 L
Non-stick coating	Yes	Yes
Built-in displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of cooking programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8
Keep warm function	Yes	Yes
Keep warm function time	12 h	12 h
Control typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Buttons
Cord lengthDiffers	1.2 m	0.8 m
Detachable lidKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Easy to clean	Yes	Yes
Plastic steam tray	Yes	Yes
Removable bowlKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Detachable and washable inner lidKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Easy-to-clean non-stick inner pot	Yes	Yes
Fuzzy Logic controlsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Bowl capacityKnown for one	1 L	Unknown — not stated by the source
Water level indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Automatic keep warmKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher safe inner potKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Detachable power cordKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ready indicatorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Spillover prevention ventKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
PowerDiffers	400 W	600 W
AC input frequency	50 Hz	50 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers	220 V	220-240 V
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	252 mm	240 mm
DepthDiffers	252 mm	338 mm
HeightDiffers	232 mm	210 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Measuring cup	Yes	Yes
Spatula	Yes	Yes
Rice scoopKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90%
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rice cooker comparisons

All rice cooker comparisons