Product comparison · 2 rice cookers

Philips HD3003/30 rice cooker vs Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 9identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips HD3003/30 rice cooker has 1.26 L more volume than the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker (1.8 L vs 0.54 L). The Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker has 2 more cooking programs than the Philips HD3003/30 rice cooker (5 vs 3). The Philips HD3003/30 rice cooker has 36 h more keep warm function time than the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker (48 h vs 12 h). Only the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker has built-in display. Product colour: Silver, White on the Philips HD3003/30 rice cooker, White, Pink on the Philips HD3064/62 rice cooker.

  • Product colour
    • HD3003/30 rice cooker:Silver, White
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:White, Pink
  • Volume
    • HD3003/30 rice cooker:1.8 L
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:0.54 L
  • Built-in display
    • HD3003/30 rice cooker:No
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:Yes
  • Number of cooking programs
    • HD3003/30 rice cooker:3
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:5
  • Keep warm function time
    • HD3003/30 rice cooker:48 h
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:12 h
  • AC input voltage
    • HD3003/30 rice cooker:220 V
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:220-240 V
  • Packaging recyclability rate
    • HD3003/30 rice cooker:100%
    • HD3064/62 rice cooker:90%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of HD3003/30, HD3064/62
40 specifications
A

Philips

HD3003/30 rice cooker

Model HD3003/30

View product
B

Philips

HD3064/62 rice cooker

Model HD3064/62

View product
Features5 differ
Product colourDiffersSilver, WhiteWhite, Pink
VolumeDiffers1.8 L0.54 L
Steam cookingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-stick coatingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal coatingKnown for oneAluminiumUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayDiffersNoYes
Number of cooking programsDiffers35
Keep warm functionYesYes
Keep warm function timeDiffers48 h12 h
Housing materialKnown for onePlastic, MetalUnknown — not stated by the source
LockingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Plastic steam trayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Removable bowlYesYes
Automatic keep warmKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Control typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceButtons
Cord lengthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.8 m
Detachable lidKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Detachable power cordKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy to cleanKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Cooking menus quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5
Detachable and washable inner lidKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Easy-to-clean non-stick inner potKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Fuzzy Logic controlsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power400 W400 W
AC input frequency50 Hz50 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers220 V220-240 V
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WidthKnown for one275 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one325 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one260 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one2.38 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Measuring cupYesYes
SpatulaYesYes
Steaming basketKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Rice scoopKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Other featuresidentical
Doesn't containKnown for onePVC/BFR, Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)Unknown — not stated by the source
Warranty period2 year(s)2 year(s)
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Technical details1 differ
Dangerous goodsNoNo
Packaging recyclability rateDiffers100%90%
User manual recycled paperYesYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rice cooker comparisons

All rice cooker comparisons