Product comparison · 2 rice cookers

Cosori 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker vs Philips 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker

14specifications compared
7differ
7identical
28known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker has 200 W more power than the Cosori 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker (1200 W vs 1000 W). The Cosori 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker has 10 Hz more AC input frequency than the Philips 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker (60 Hz vs 50 Hz). The Philips 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker has 100 V more AC input voltage than the Cosori 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker (220 V vs 120 V). Product colour: Black on the Cosori 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker, Grey on the Philips 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker.

Product colour
- 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker:Black
- 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker:Grey
Power
- 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker:1000 W
- 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker:1200 W
AC input frequency
- 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker:60 Hz
- 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker:50 Hz
AC input voltage
- 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker:120 V
- 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker:220 V
Width
- 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker:312 mm
- 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker:287 mm
Depth
- 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker:234 mm
- 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker:334 mm
Height
- 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker:269 mm
- 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker:255 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker, HD5200/90
42 specifications	A Cosori 5.0-Quart Rice Cooker View product	B Philips 5000 series HD5200/90 rice cooker Model HD5200/90 View product
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	Grey
VolumeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 L
Non-stick coatingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Backlight displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Preset cooking programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of cooking programsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11
Hinged lidKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Plastic steam trayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Steam tray for healthy cookingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Steam cookingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
TimerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Delayed start timerKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dishwasher-proof partsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Easy to cleanKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Handle(s)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Overheat protectionKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power3 differ
PowerDiffers	1000 W	1200 W
AC input frequencyDiffers	60 Hz	50 Hz
AC input voltageDiffers	120 V	220 V
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	312 mm	287 mm
DepthDiffers	234 mm	334 mm
HeightDiffers	269 mm	255 mm
WeightKnown for one	4.2 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Rice scoopKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
SpatulaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recipe bookKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)
Doesn't containKnown for one	Bisphenol A (BPA), Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Dangerous goodsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90%
Power consumption (max)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1200 W
User manual recycled paperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rice cooker comparisons

All rice cooker comparisons