Product comparison · 2 remote controls

Hama Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons vs Philips Smart button

17specifications compared
12differ
5identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Smart button has 5 m more maximum range than the Hama Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons (15 m vs 10 m). The Philips Smart button has 26 mm more width than the Hama Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons (64 mm vs 38 mm). The Philips Smart button has 45 mm more depth than the Hama Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons (64 mm vs 19 mm). Remote control proper use: TV on the Hama Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons, Lighting on the Philips Smart button. Brand compatibility: Universal on the Hama Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons, WiZ on the Philips Smart button.

Remote control proper use
- Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons:TV
- Smart button:Lighting
Brand compatibility
- Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons:Universal
- Smart button:WiZ
Product colour
- Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons:Black
- Smart button:Grey, White
Maximum range
- Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons:10 m
- Smart button:15 m
Width
- Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons:38 mm
- Smart button:64 mm
Depth
- Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons:19 mm
- Smart button:64 mm
Height
- Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons:140 mm
- Smart button:18.5 mm
Weight
- Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons:50 g
- Smart button:66 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Nano, 8719514554795
34 specifications	A Hama Nano remote control IR Wireless TV Press buttons Model Nano View product	B Philips Smart button Model 8719514554795 View product
Design3 differ
Remote control proper useDiffers	TV	Lighting
Brand compatibilityDiffers	Universal	WiZ
Product colourDiffers	Black	Grey, White
Protection classKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	III
InterfaceKnown for one	IR Wireless	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Maximum rangeDiffers	10 m	15 m
International Protection (IP) codeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IP20
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 m
Number of devices supportedKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Number of batteries supportedKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	38 mm	64 mm
DepthDiffers	19 mm	64 mm
HeightDiffers	140 mm	18.5 mm
LengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	64 mm
WeightDiffers	50 g	66 g
Net weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	66 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	180 mm	7.6 mm
Package depthDiffers	60 mm	4.6 mm
Package heightDiffers	30 mm	161 mm
Package weightDiffers	135 g	117 g
Package gross weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 g
Packaging contentidentical
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
12NC Logistic code(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	929003501301
Package net weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	70 g
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)
Supplier featuresidentical
MaterialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Plastic
Other featuresidentical
EAN/UPC/GTINKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8719514554795
Displayidentical
Built-in displayKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More remote control comparisons

All remote control comparisons