Product comparison · 2 raid controllers

GIGABYTE CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s vs HP P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 3identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The GIGABYTE CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s has 6 Gbit/s more data transfer rate than the HP P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller (12 Gbit/s vs 6 Gbit/s). The HP P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller has 1,022 MB more internal memory than the GIGABYTE CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s (1024 MB vs 2 MB). The HP P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller has 79.7 mm more width than the GIGABYTE CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s (190.5 mm vs 110.8 mm). Host interface: PCI on the GIGABYTE CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s, PCI Express x8 on the HP P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller.

  • Host interface
    • CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s:PCI
    • P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller:PCI Express x8
  • Data transfer rate
    • CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s:12 Gbit/s
    • P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller:6 Gbit/s
  • Internal memory
    • CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s:2 MB
    • P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller:1024 MB
  • Width
    • CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s:110.8 mm
    • P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller:190.5 mm
  • Depth
    • CRAO438 RAID controller PCI 3.0 12 Gbit/s:78 mm
    • P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller:241.3 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CRAO438, P420/1GB FBWC 6Gb 2-ports Int SAS Controller
19 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Supported storage drive interfacesSASSAS
Host interfaceDiffersPCIPCI Express x8
PCI Express slots versionKnown for one3.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Internal mini-SAS ports22
Internal SAS portsKnown for one8Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
RAID levels0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 50, 600, 1, 5, 6, 10, 50, 60
Data transfer rateDiffers12 Gbit/s6 Gbit/s
Internal memoryDiffers2 MB1024 MB
Internal memory typeKnown for oneDDR3Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory clock speedKnown for one1866 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
SSD supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers110.8 mm190.5 mm
DepthDiffers78 mm241.3 mm
Package widthKnown for one251 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one305 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one220 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source57.2 mm
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More raid controller comparisons

All raid controller comparisons