Product comparison · 2 raid controllers

Fujitsu PRAID EM400i vs Lenovo 7Y37A01085 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12000 Gbit/s

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 6identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The Lenovo 7Y37A01085 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12000 Gbit/s has 11,988 Gbit/s more data transfer rate than the Fujitsu PRAID EM400i (12000 Gbit/s vs 12 Gbit/s). Supported storage drive interfaces: SAS-3, Serial ATA III on the Fujitsu PRAID EM400i, SAS, Serial ATA III on the Lenovo 7Y37A01085 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12000 Gbit/s. RAID levels: 0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 50, 60 on the Fujitsu PRAID EM400i, 0, 1, 10, 5, 50, 6, 60 on the Lenovo 7Y37A01085 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12000 Gbit/s.

  • Supported storage drive interfaces
    • PRAID EM400i:SAS-3, Serial ATA III
    • 7Y37A01085 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12000 Gbit/s:SAS, Serial ATA III
  • RAID levels
    • PRAID EM400i:0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 50, 60
    • 7Y37A01085 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12000 Gbit/s:0, 1, 10, 5, 50, 6, 60
  • Data transfer rate
    • PRAID EM400i:12 Gbit/s
    • 7Y37A01085 RAID controller PCI Express x8 3.0 12000 Gbit/s:12000 Gbit/s

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of PRAID EM400i, 7Y37A01085
29 specifications
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Supported storage drive interfacesDiffersSAS-3, Serial ATA IIISAS, Serial ATA III
Host interfacePCI Express x8PCI Express x8
PCI Express slots version3.03.0
Internal mini-SAS HD portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Internal SAS portsKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
External SAS portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance2 differ
RAID Level MigrationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
RAID levelsDiffers0, 1, 5, 6, 10, 50, 600, 1, 10, 5, 50, 6, 60
Data transfer rateDiffers12 Gbit/s12000 Gbit/s
SSD supportYesYes
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4000 MB
ChipsetKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLSI SAS3516
Number of devices supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16
Online Capacity ExpansionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
S.M.A.R.T. supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Hot-swapKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFCC Part 15 Class A Australia/New Zealand (AS/NZS CISPR 22) Canada (ICES-003 Class B) Europe (EN55022/EN55024) Japan (VCCI V-3) Korea (RRA no 2013-24 & 25) RoHS compliant EN/IEC/UL 60950 Taiwan (CNS 13438) USA (FCC 47 CFR part 15 Subpart B class B) WEEE
Compatible productsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceST550, SR550, SR570, SR590, SR630, SR650, SR850, SR860, SR950
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Built-in processorYesYes
Processor familyLSILSI
Processor frequencyKnown for one1.2 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicrosoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Microsoft Windows Server 2016 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server x64 Edition Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 for AMD64/EM64T SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 11 with Xen for AMD64/EM64T SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SUSE Linux Enterprise Serve
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 55 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 95%
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source84733080
Other featuresidentical
PCI Card form factorFull-height (low-profile)Full-height (low-profile)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More raid controller comparisons

All raid controller comparisons