Product comparison · 2 raclette grills

Tefal Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s) vs Tefal RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s)

24specifications compared
15differ
9identical
12known for one product only

Key differences

The Tefal Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s) has 300 W more power than the Tefal RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s) (1350 W vs 1050 W). The Tefal RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s) has 69 mm more width than the Tefal Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s) (325 mm vs 256 mm). The Tefal Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s) has 108 mm more depth than the Tefal RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s) (508 mm vs 400 mm). Only the Tefal RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s) has dishwasher-proof parts. Product colour: Grey on the Tefal Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s), Black, Blue on the Tefal RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s).

Dishwasher-proof parts
- Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s):No
- RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s):Yes
Product colour
- Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s):Grey
- RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s):Black, Blue
Power
- Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s):1350 W
- RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s):1050 W
Width
- Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s):256 mm
- RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s):325 mm
Depth
- Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s):508 mm
- RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s):400 mm
Height
- Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s):73 mm
- RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s):130 mm
Weight
- Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s):5.93 kg
- RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s):2.16 kg
Package width
- Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s):327 mm
- RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s):399 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PR620D, RE3104
36 specifications	A Tefal Equinox KTM PR620D raclette grill 8 person(s) Model PR620D View product	B Tefal RE3104 raclette grill 8 person(s) Model RE3104 View product
Features2 differ
Number of persons	8 person(s)	8 person(s)
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Thermoplastic
Adjustable thermostat	No	No
Non-stick coating	Yes	Yes
Detachable power cord	Yes	Yes
Dishwasher-proof partsDiffers	No	Yes
Easy to clean	Yes	Yes
Form factorKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Round
On/off switch	Yes	Yes
Product colourDiffers	Grey	Black, Blue
Number of cooking zonesKnown for one	8 zone(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Indication lightKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Removable plate(s)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cord lengthKnown for one	1.2 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	1350 W	1050 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	256 mm	325 mm
DepthDiffers	508 mm	400 mm
HeightDiffers	73 mm	130 mm
WeightDiffers	5.93 kg	2.16 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	327 mm	399 mm
Package depthDiffers	553 mm	399 mm
Package heightDiffers	222 mm	141 mm
Package weightDiffers	6.36 kg	2.23 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Number of pans	8 pc(s)	8 pc(s)
Recipe bookKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics data4 differ
Pallet net heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	95 cm
Pallet net lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 cm
Pallet net weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	71.4 kg
Pallet net widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 cm
Products per intermodal container (20ft)Differs	750 pc(s)	1170 pc(s)
Products per intermodal container (40ft)Differs	1530 pc(s)	2470 pc(s)
Layers per pallet	2 pc(s)	2 pc(s)
Products per pallet layerDiffers	10 pc(s)	16 pc(s)
Products per palletDiffers	20 pc(s)	32 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
Country of origin	France	France
Doesn't containKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More raclette grill comparisons

All raclette grill comparisons