Product comparison · 2 rack cooling equipment

Middle Atlantic 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM vs Middle Atlantic 100 CFM Fan Panel

14specifications compared
6differ
8identical
2known for one product only

Key differences

The Middle Atlantic 100 CFM Fan Panel has 1 U more rack capacity than the Middle Atlantic 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM (2U vs 1U). The Middle Atlantic 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM has 3 dB more noise level than the Middle Atlantic 100 CFM Fan Panel (30 dB vs 27 dB). The Middle Atlantic 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM has 170.1 mm more depth than the Middle Atlantic 100 CFM Fan Panel (256.5 mm vs 86.4 mm). Number of fans: 2 fan(s) on the Middle Atlantic 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM, 4 fan(s) on the Middle Atlantic 100 CFM Fan Panel.

Rack capacity
- 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM:1U
- 100 CFM Fan Panel:2U
Number of fans
- 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM:2 fan(s)
- 100 CFM Fan Panel:4 fan(s)
Noise level
- 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM:30 dB
- 100 CFM Fan Panel:27 dB
Depth
- 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM:256.5 mm
- 100 CFM Fan Panel:86.4 mm
Height
- 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM:44.5 mm
- 100 CFM Fan Panel:88.9 mm
Package weight
- 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM:2.36 kg
- 100 CFM Fan Panel:2.18 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of IQBP-2A, IUQFP-4
16 specifications	A Middle Atlantic 1 RU BlowerPanel, 100 CFM Model IQBP-2A View product	B Middle Atlantic 100 CFM Fan Panel Model IUQFP-4 View product
Performance3 differ
Rack capacityDiffers	1U	2U
Number of fansDiffers	2 fan(s)	4 fan(s)
Audible alarm(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Noise levelDiffers	30 dB	27 dB
Featuresidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Weight & dimensions2 differ
DepthDiffers	256.5 mm	86.4 mm
HeightDiffers	44.5 mm	88.9 mm
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	2.36 kg	2.18 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More rack cooling equipment comparisons

All rack cooling equipment comparisons