Product comparison · 2 projection screens

Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200" vs Nilox AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 1identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200" has 1.97 m more viewable screen width (W) than the Nilox AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9 (4.31 m vs 2.34 m). The Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200" has 42 kg more weight than the Nilox AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9 (52.5 kg vs 10.5 kg). Diagonal: 5.08 m (200") on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200", 2.74 m (108") on the Nilox AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9. Native aspect ratio: 16:10 on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200", 16:9 on the Nilox AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9. Viewable screen height (H): 2.69 m on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200", 135 cm on the Nilox AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9.

  • Diagonal
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200":5.08 m (200")
    • AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9:2.74 m (108")
  • Native aspect ratio
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200":16:10
    • AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9:16:9
  • Viewable screen height (H)
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200":2.69 m
    • AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9:135 cm
  • Viewable screen width (W)
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200":4.31 m
    • AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9:2.34 m
  • Mounting type
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200":Floor
    • AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9:Wall
  • Product colour
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200":Black, White
    • AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9:White
  • Weight
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,431x269,200":52.5 kg
    • AMLI143584 projection screen 2.74 m (108") 16:9:10.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 2005, AMLI143584
25 specifications
Performance4 differ
DiagonalDiffers5.08 m (200")2.74 m (108")
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:1016:9
Viewable screen height (H)Differs2.69 m135 cm
Viewable screen width (W)Differs4.31 m2.34 m
Diagonal (metric)Known for one508.1 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Screen surfaceKnown for oneMatte WhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
Tensioned screenKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Screen gainKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Overall screen size (Height x Width)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source244 x 175 cm
FormatKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHDTV
Design2 differ
Mounting typeDiffersFloorWall
Frame typeKnown for oneFolding frameUnknown — not stated by the source
BordersKnown for one7 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffersBlack, WhiteWhite
Case colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWhite
MaterialKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePVC
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers52.5 kg10.5 kg
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2560 x 70 x 70 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one420 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one1260 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one420 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one52.7 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More projection screen comparisons

All projection screen comparisons