Product comparison · 2 projection screens

Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150" vs Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 2identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150" has 167.9 cm more diagonal (metric) than the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232 (380.9 cm vs 213 cm). The Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150" has 9.4 kg more weight than the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232 (31.4 kg vs 22 kg). The Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232 has 1,910 mm more package width than the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150" (2280 mm vs 370 mm). Diagonal: 3.81 m (150") on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150", 2.13 m (84") on the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232. Native aspect ratio: 16:10 on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150", 16:9 on the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232.

  • Diagonal
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":3.81 m (150")
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:2.13 m (84")
  • Native aspect ratio
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":16:10
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:16:9
  • Viewable screen height (H)
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":2.02 m
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:105 cm
  • Viewable screen width (W)
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":3.23 m
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:186 cm
  • Diagonal (metric)
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":380.9 cm
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:213 cm
  • Drive type
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":Manual
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:Motorized
  • Weight
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":31.4 kg
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:22 kg
  • Package width
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":370 mm
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:2280 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 1985, 8606
25 specifications
Performance6 differ
DiagonalDiffers3.81 m (150")2.13 m (84")
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:1016:9
Viewable screen height (H)Differs2.02 m105 cm
Viewable screen width (W)Differs3.23 m186 cm
Diagonal (metric)Differs380.9 cm213 cm
Drive typeDiffersManualMotorized
Screen surfaceKnown for oneMatte WhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
Tensioned screenKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Screen gainKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Frequency rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source868 Hz
Designidentical
Frame typeKnown for oneFolding frameUnknown — not stated by the source
BordersKnown for one7 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for oneBlack, WhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
Black backingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Black dropKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 cm
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers31.4 kg22 kg
Dimensions folded (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2172 x 200 x 123 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers370 mm2280 mm
Package depthDiffers1380 mm230 mm
Package heightDiffers370 mm240 mm
Package weightDiffers31.3 kg26.4 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More projection screen comparisons

All projection screen comparisons