Product comparison · 2 projection screens

Multibrackets M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300" vs Multibrackets M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300"

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 10identical
  • 0known for one product only

Key differences

  • Native aspect ratio
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300":16:9
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300":16:10
  • Viewable screen height (H)
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300":3.74 m
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300":4.04 m
  • Viewable screen width (W)
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300":6.64 m
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300":6.46 m
  • Diagonal (metric)
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300":762.1 cm
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300":761.9 cm
  • Package width
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300":440 mm
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300":350 mm
  • Package depth
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300":1580 mm
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300":1340 mm
  • Package height
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300":440 mm
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300":350 mm
  • Package weight
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:9,664x374,300":103.1 kg
    • M Quick Fold Proj Screen, 16:10,646x404,300":98.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 1961, 2029
18 specifications
Performance4 differ
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Viewable screen height (H)Differs3.74 m4.04 m
Viewable screen width (W)Differs6.64 m6.46 m
Diagonal (metric)Differs762.1 cm761.9 cm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers440 mm350 mm
Package depthDiffers1580 mm1340 mm
Package heightDiffers440 mm350 mm
Package weightDiffers103.1 kg98.5 kg

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More projection screen comparisons

All projection screen comparisons