Product comparison · 2 projection screens

Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180 vs Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 3identical
  • 13known for one product only

Key differences

The Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180 has 1.79 m more viewable screen width (W) than the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232 (4 m vs 2.21 m). The Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180 has 204.9 cm more diagonal (metric) than the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232 (458.9 cm vs 254 cm). The Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232 has 2,210 mm more package width than the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180 (2630 mm vs 420 mm). Diagonal: 4.57 m (180") on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180, 2.54 m (100") on the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232. Viewable screen height (H): 2.25 m on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180, 125 cm on the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232.

  • Diagonal
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180:4.57 m (180")
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232:2.54 m (100")
  • Viewable screen height (H)
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180:2.25 m
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232:125 cm
  • Viewable screen width (W)
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180:4 m
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232:2.21 m
  • Diagonal (metric)
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180:458.9 cm
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232:254 cm
  • Drive type
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180:Manual
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232:Motorized
  • Package width
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180:420 mm
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232:2630 mm
  • Package depth
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180:1060 mm
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232:230 mm
  • Package height
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen,16:9,400x225,180:420 mm
    • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 100? ALR UST, RS232:240 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 1930, 8613
25 specifications
Performance5 differ
DiagonalDiffers4.57 m (180")2.54 m (100")
Viewable screen height (H)Differs2.25 m125 cm
Viewable screen width (W)Differs4 m2.21 m
Diagonal (metric)Differs458.9 cm254 cm
Drive typeDiffersManualMotorized
Screen surfaceKnown for oneMatte WhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
Tensioned screenKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Screen gainKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Remotely operatedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Frequency rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source868 Hz
Designidentical
Frame typeKnown for oneFolding frameUnknown — not stated by the source
BordersKnown for one7 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for oneBlack, WhiteUnknown — not stated by the source
Black backingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Black dropKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source40 cm
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one44.5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions folded (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2526 x 200 x 123 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers420 mm2630 mm
Package depthDiffers1060 mm230 mm
Package heightDiffers420 mm240 mm
Package weightDiffers48.7 kg31.6 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More projection screen comparisons

All projection screen comparisons