iggual PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1 vs Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232

Key differences

The iggual PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1 has 69 cm more diagonal (metric) than the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232 (282 cm vs 213 cm). The Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232 has 13.5 kg more weight than the iggual PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1 (22 kg vs 8.5 kg). Diagonal: 2.82 m (111") on the iggual PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1, 2.13 m (84") on the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232. Native aspect ratio: 1:1 on the iggual PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1, 16:9 on the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232. Viewable screen height (H): 2 m on the iggual PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1, 105 cm on the Multibrackets LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232.

• Diagonal
  • PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1:2.82 m (111")
  • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:2.13 m (84")
• Native aspect ratio
  • PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1:1:1
  • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:16:9
• Viewable screen height (H)
  • PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1:2 m
  • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:105 cm
• Viewable screen width (W)
  • PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1:2 m
  • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:186 cm
• Diagonal (metric)
  • PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1:282 cm
  • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:213 cm
• Mounting type
  • PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1:Ceiling/wall
  • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:Floor
• Weight
  • PSIES200 projection screen 2.82 m (111") 1:1:8.5 kg
  • LS 16:9 Electric Floor Rising Screen 84? ALR UST, RS232:22 kg