Product comparison · 2 projection screens

Hama 17798 projection screen 1:1 vs Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150"

Add a product
  • 8specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 0identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

The Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150" has 22.19 kg more weight than the Hama 17798 projection screen 1:1 (31.4 kg vs 9.21 kg). The Hama 17798 projection screen 1:1 has 2,280 mm more package width than the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150" (2650 mm vs 370 mm). The Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150" has 1,260 mm more package depth than the Hama 17798 projection screen 1:1 (1380 mm vs 120 mm). Native aspect ratio: 1:1 on the Hama 17798 projection screen 1:1, 16:10 on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150". Drive type: Motorized on the Hama 17798 projection screen 1:1, Manual on the Multibrackets M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150".

  • Native aspect ratio
    • 17798 projection screen 1:1:1:1
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":16:10
  • Drive type
    • 17798 projection screen 1:1:Motorized
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":Manual
  • Mounting type
    • 17798 projection screen 1:1:Wall
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":Floor
  • Weight
    • 17798 projection screen 1:1:9.21 kg
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":31.4 kg
  • Package width
    • 17798 projection screen 1:1:2650 mm
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":370 mm
  • Package depth
    • 17798 projection screen 1:1:120 mm
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":1380 mm
  • Package height
    • 17798 projection screen 1:1:100 mm
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":370 mm
  • Package weight
    • 17798 projection screen 1:1:9.5 kg
    • M Quick Fold Projection Screen, 16:10,323x202,150":31.3 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 17798, 1985
22 specifications
Performance2 differ
DiagonalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.81 m (150")
Native aspect ratioDiffers1:116:10
Viewable screen height (H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.02 m
Viewable screen width (W)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.23 m
Diagonal (metric)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source380.9 cm
Drive typeDiffersMotorizedManual
Screen surfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMatte White
Tensioned screenKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Screen gainKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Overall screen size (Height x Width)Known for one200 x 240 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angleKnown for one150°Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Mounting typeDiffersWallFloor
Frame typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFolding frame
BordersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 cm
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack, White
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers9.21 kg31.4 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Quantity per packKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)
Package widthDiffers2650 mm370 mm
Package depthDiffers120 mm1380 mm
Package heightDiffers100 mm370 mm
Package weightDiffers9.5 kg31.3 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More projection screen comparisons

All projection screen comparisons