All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 print servers

HP NFC/Wireless 1200w Mobile Print Accessory vs Lindy 42384 print server Wireless LAN

Add a product
  • 6specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 1identical
  • 33known for one product only

Key differences

The HP NFC/Wireless 1200w Mobile Print Accessory has 126 MB more flash memory than the Lindy 42384 print server Wireless LAN (128 MB vs 2 MB). The HP NFC/Wireless 1200w Mobile Print Accessory has 120 MB more internal memory than the Lindy 42384 print server Wireless LAN (128 MB vs 8 MB). The HP NFC/Wireless 1200w Mobile Print Accessory has 10 - 95% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the Lindy 42384 print server Wireless LAN (15 - 95% vs 5 - 95%). Supported network protocols: 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, NFC on the HP NFC/Wireless 1200w Mobile Print Accessory, BootP SNMP, Telnet, FTP, LPD, DHCP, IPP on the Lindy 42384 print server Wireless LAN. Storage temperature (T-T): -40 - 70 °C on the HP NFC/Wireless 1200w Mobile Print Accessory, -20 - 55 °C on the Lindy 42384 print server Wireless LAN.

  • Flash memory
    • 128 MB
    • 2 MB
  • Internal memory
    • 128 MB
    • 8 MB
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • 15 - 95%
    • 5 - 95%
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • -40 - 70 °C
    • -20 - 55 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
39 specifications
A

HP

NFC/Wireless 1200w Mobile Print AccessoryView product
B

Lindy

42384 print server Wireless LAN

Model 42384

View product
Featuresidentical
InternalKnown for oneNo
Product colourKnown for oneBlack
IPP supportKnown for oneYes
Memory2 differ
Flash memoryDiffers128 MB2 MB
Internal memoryDiffers128 MB8 MB
Networkidentical
Network connection typeWireless LANWireless LAN
Networking standardsKnown for oneIEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n
Wi-Fi bandKnown for oneSingle-band (2.4 GHz)
Security algorithmsKnown for oneWPA2
Protocols1 differ
Supported network protocolsDiffers802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n, NFCBootP SNMP, Telnet, FTP, LPD, DHCP, IPP
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one0
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one2
Parallel ports quantityKnown for one0
Serial ports quantityKnown for one0
USB connector typeKnown for oneUSB Type-A, USB Type-B
DC-in jackKnown for oneYes
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one100-240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 Hz
Power consumption (typical)Known for one2.5 W
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneAndroid, iOS
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for one111.2 mm
HeightKnown for one27.5 mm
WidthKnown for one67.5 mm
WeightKnown for one80 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one192 x 144 x 65 mm
Package weightKnown for one390 g
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs15 - 95%5 - 95%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one15 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-40 - 70 °C-20 - 55 °C
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 50 °C
Other featuresidentical
Data transfer rateKnown for one54 Mbit/s
Power requirementsKnown for one5V DC
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one90 x 80 x 40 mm
Supported protocolsKnown for oneTCP/IP, SMB, NetBEUI, AppleTalk
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneWindows 95/98/ME, Windows NT/2000/XP/2003, Netware 5.x, HP-UX Unix, Sun OS, Solaris, SCO Unix, AIX, Unixware / Linux, Mac OS
InterfaceKnown for oneUSB 2.0
Networking featuresKnown for oneFast Ethernet

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More print server comparisons

All print server comparisons