Product comparison · 2 print servers

HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server vs StarTech.com 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server

8specifications compared
6differ
2identical
41known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server has 83 g more weight than the StarTech.com 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server (128 g vs 45 g). The HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server has 172 mm more package width than the StarTech.com 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server (250 mm vs 78 mm). The StarTech.com 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server has 110 mm more package depth than the HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server (240 mm vs 130 mm). Network connection type: Ethernet LAN/Wireless LAN on the HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server, Ethernet LAN on the StarTech.com 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server.

Network connection type
- Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:Ethernet LAN/Wireless LAN
- 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server:Ethernet LAN
Weight
- Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:128 g
- 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server:45 g
Package width
- Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:250 mm
- 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server:78 mm
Package depth
- Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:130 mm
- 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server:240 mm
Package height
- Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:75 mm
- 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server:158 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server, 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server
49 specifications	A HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server View product	B StarTech.com 10/100 Mbps USB Print Server View product
Featuresidentical
InternalKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for one	China, Japan, United States, Singapore, Switzerland	Unknown — not stated by the source
HP segmentKnown for one	Enterprise, Business	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Network connection typeDiffers	Ethernet LAN/Wireless LAN	Ethernet LAN
Networking standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	10,100,1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for one	SNMPv3, SSL/TLS, HTTPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T	Unknown — not stated by the source
Protocols1 differ
Supported network protocolsDiffers	IPv4/IPv6: Apple Bonjour compatible, SNMPv1/v2c/v3, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, TFTP, Port 9100, LPD, IPP, Secure-IPP, WS Discovery, WS Print, IPsec/Firewall; IPv6: DHCPv6, MLDv1, ICMPv6; IPv4: Auto-IP, SLP, Telnet, IGMPv2, BOOTP/DHCP, WINS, IP Direct Mode; AirPrint, GCP 2.0, ePrint	TCP/IP
Management protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SNMP
Ports & interfacesidentical
Parallel ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Serial ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
DC-in jackKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	220 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	9.6 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	EU (EMC Directive 2004/108/EC); EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2; EN 489-17 V2.1.1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for one	Complies with RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU; EN50581:2012	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthKnown for one	121.3 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	27.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	87 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers	128 g	45 g
Packaging data3 differ
Package widthDiffers	250 mm	78 mm
Package depthDiffers	130 mm	240 mm
Package heightDiffers	75 mm	158 mm
Package weightKnown for one	605 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	32 - 104 °F	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	15 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	15 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-40 - 70 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Brand-specific featuresidentical
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one	889296868101	Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	RoHS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for one	21 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weight (imperial)Known for one	3.81 kg (8.4 lbs)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Layers per palletKnown for one	4 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one	5 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	See the printer data sheet for Compatible Network Operating Systems.	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one	420 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recommended operating temperature range (T-T)Known for one	0 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one	43201537	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)Known for one	1201.4 x 1000.8 x 1242.1 mm (47.3 x 39.4 x 48.9")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet weight (imperial)Known for one	340.6 kg (751 lbs)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recommended humidity operating rangeKnown for one	15 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.5V DC, 500mA
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	55 x 75 x 20 mm
Network readyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More print server comparisons

All print server comparisons