Product comparison · 2 print servers

HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server vs Samsung CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 5identical
  • 33known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server has 63.3 mm more depth than the Samsung CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White (121.3 mm vs 58 mm). The HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server has 15 mm more height than the Samsung CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White (27.5 mm vs 12.5 mm). The Samsung CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White has 11 mm more width than the HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server (98 mm vs 87 mm). Product colour: Black on the HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server, White on the Samsung CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White. Network connection type: Ethernet LAN/Wireless LAN on the HP Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server, Wireless LAN on the Samsung CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White.

  • Product colour
    • Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:Black
    • CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White:White
  • Network connection type
    • Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:Ethernet LAN/Wireless LAN
    • CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White:Wireless LAN
  • Security algorithms
    • Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:SNMPv3, SSL/TLS, HTTPS
    • CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White:TKIP, WEP, WPA-PSK
  • Depth
    • Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:121.3 mm
    • CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White:58 mm
  • Height
    • Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:27.5 mm
    • CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White:12.5 mm
  • Width
    • Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:87 mm
    • CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White:98 mm
  • Weight
    • Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server:128 g
    • CLX-NWA20L print server Wireless LAN White:60 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Jetdirect 2900nw Print Server, CLX-NWA20L
45 specifications
Features1 differ
InternalNoNo
Product colourDiffersBlackWhite
Country of originKnown for oneChina, Japan, United States, Singapore, SwitzerlandUnknown — not stated by the source
HP segmentKnown for oneEnterprise, BusinessUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in displayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Network2 differ
Network connection typeDiffersEthernet LAN/Wireless LANWireless LAN
Networking standardsIEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11nIEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11n
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100,1000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsDiffersSNMPv3, SSL/TLS, HTTPSTKIP, WEP, WPA-PSK
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-TUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneIPv4/IPv6: Apple Bonjour compatible, SNMPv1/v2c/v3, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, TFTP, Port 9100, LPD, IPP, Secure-IPP, WS Discovery, WS Print, IPsec/Firewall; IPv6: DHCPv6, MLDv1, ICMPv6; IPv4: Auto-IP, SLP, Telnet, IGMPv2, BOOTP/DHCP, WINS, IP Direct Mode; AirPrint, GCP 2.0, ePrintUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantity11
Parallel ports quantity00
Serial ports quantity00
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one220 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one9.6 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneEU (EMC Directive 2004/108/EC); EN 301 489-1 V1.9.2; EN 489-17 V2.1.1Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for oneComplies with RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU; EN50581:2012Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers121.3 mm58 mm
HeightDiffers27.5 mm12.5 mm
WidthDiffers87 mm98 mm
WeightDiffers128 g60 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one250 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one130 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one75 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one605 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one32 - 104 °FUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one15 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one15 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Brand-specific featuresidentical
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for one889296868101Unknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneRoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for one21 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) case gross weight (imperial)Known for one3.81 kg (8.4 lbs)Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Layers per palletKnown for one4 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one5 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneSee the printer data sheet for Compatible Network Operating Systems.Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per palletKnown for one420 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Recommended operating temperature range (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
UNSPSC-codeKnown for one43201537Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)Known for one1201.4 x 1000.8 x 1242.1 mm (47.3 x 39.4 x 48.9")Unknown — not stated by the source
Pallet weight (imperial)Known for one340.6 kg (751 lbs)Unknown — not stated by the source
Recommended humidity operating rangeKnown for one15 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More print server comparisons

All print server comparisons