Product comparison · 2 print servers

HP Jetdirect en3700 print server Ethernet LAN Grey vs Nilox Print Server USB + 1 Porta LAN

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 7identical
  • 27known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Jetdirect en3700 print server Ethernet LAN Grey has 932 g more weight than the Nilox Print Server USB + 1 Porta LAN (990 g vs 58 g). LED indicators: Yes on the HP Jetdirect en3700 print server Ethernet LAN Grey, USB on the Nilox Print Server USB + 1 Porta LAN.

  • LED indicators
    • Jetdirect en3700 print server Ethernet LAN Grey:Yes
    • Print Server USB + 1 Porta LAN:USB
  • Weight
    • Jetdirect en3700 print server Ethernet LAN Grey:990 g
    • Print Server USB + 1 Porta LAN:58 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of en3700, Print Server USB + 1 Porta LAN
37 specifications
Features1 differ
InternalKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Product colourKnown for oneGreyUnknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsDiffersYesUSB
Firmware upgradeableKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
IPP supportKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Memoryidentical
Flash memoryKnown for one4 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Internal memoryKnown for one8 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Security algorithmsKnown for oneSSL/TLSUnknown — not stated by the source
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one100BASE-TX, 10BASE-TUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneTCP/IP, IPX/SPX, AppleTalk, DLC/LLC, IP, LPD2, FTP, IPP; NDS, Bindery, NCP, NDPS, iPrint; Telnet, SLP, IGMP, BOOTP/DHCP, WINS, SNMP, HTTPUnknown — not stated by the source
Management protocolsKnown for oneSNMP v3.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Serial ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one110-220 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Softwareidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 2000, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows NT, Windows XP Home, Windows XP Home x64, Windows XP Professional, Windows XP Professional x64Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMac OS 8.6, Mac OS 9.0, Mac OS 9.1, Mac OS 9.2Unknown — not stated by the source
Other operating systems supportedKnown for oneNovell NetWare 4.x, Novell NetWare 5.x, Novell NetWare 6.xUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
SafetyKnown for oneEN60950Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEN55022 A1, A2, EN61000-3-2: 2000, EN61000-3-3 A12001, EN55024 A1, A2.
Weight & dimensions1 differ
DepthKnown for one128 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one75 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one249 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers990 g58 g
Packaging contentidentical
External power adapterKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Minimum system requirementsKnown for oneMicrosoft Internet Explorer 4.0 +, Netscape 5.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows Server 2003, Red Hat Linux 6.x +, SuSE Linux 6.x +, HP-UX 10.20, 11.x, Solaris 2.5x, 2.6, 7, 8, IBM AIX 3.2.5 +, MPE-iXWindows 98SE/ME/2000/XP/Vista, Mac OS 8.1, Unix / Linux, NetWare (Bindery / NDS).
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source64 x 73 x 28 mm
Power supply typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDC
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 x 230 x 70 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More print server comparisons

All print server comparisons