Product comparison · 2 print servers

Epson SIDM EpsonNet 10/100 Base Tx Internal Print Server PS107 vs HP Jetdirect LAN Accessory

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 4identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

  • Country of origin
    • SIDM EpsonNet 10/100 Base Tx Internal Print Server PS107:Japan
    • Jetdirect LAN Accessory:China
  • Package width
    • SIDM EpsonNet 10/100 Base Tx Internal Print Server PS107:50 mm
    • Jetdirect LAN Accessory:178 mm
  • Package depth
    • SIDM EpsonNet 10/100 Base Tx Internal Print Server PS107:261 mm
    • Jetdirect LAN Accessory:138 mm
  • Package height
    • SIDM EpsonNet 10/100 Base Tx Internal Print Server PS107:160 mm
    • Jetdirect LAN Accessory:60 mm
  • Package weight
    • SIDM EpsonNet 10/100 Base Tx Internal Print Server PS107:0.339 g
    • Jetdirect LAN Accessory:320 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 1620202, Jetdirect LAN Accessory
33 specifications
Features1 differ
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
IPP supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Country of originDiffersJapanChina
HP segmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBusiness
Networkidentical
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIPv4/IPv6: Apple Bonjour® compatible, SNMPv1/v2c/v3, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, TFTP, Port 9100, LPD, IPP, Secure-IPP, WS Discovery, WS Print, IPsec/Firewall; IPv6: DHCPv6, MLDv1, ICMPv6; IPv4: Auto-IP, SLP, Telnet, IGMPv2, BOOTP/DHCP, WINS, IP Direct Mode; AirPrint, GCP 2.0, ePrint
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCISPR 22:2008 (International) Class A, CISPR 32:2012 (International) Class A / EN 55032:2012 Class A, CISPR 35:2016 (International) Class A / EN 55035:2017 Class A, EN 55024:2010 +A1:2015, EN 61000-3-2:2014, EN 61000-3-3:2013, FCC CFR 47 Part 15 Class A, ICES-003, Issue 6 Class A. Other EMC approval
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source121.3 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source27.5 mm
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source87 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source128 g
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers50 mm178 mm
Package depthDiffers261 mm138 mm
Package heightDiffers160 mm60 mm
Package weightDiffers0.339 g320 g
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source15 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-40 - 70 °C
Brand-specific featuresidentical
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source19444185362
Technical detailsidentical
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 pc(s)
Master (outer) case gross weight (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6.49 kg (14.3 lbs)
Logistics dataidentical
Layers per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 pc(s)
Pallet gross weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source216.3 kg
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18 pc(s)
Other featuresidentical
Products per palletKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source540 pc(s)
UNSPSC-codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source43201537
Pallet dimensions (W x D x H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1200 x 1000 x 1270 mm
Pallet dimensions (W x D x H) (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1201.4 x 1000.8 x 1270 mm (47.3 x 39.4 x 50")
Pallet weight (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source215.9 kg (475.9 lbs)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More print server comparisons

All print server comparisons