Product comparison · 2 print servers

DYMO LabelWriter Print Server vs HP Jetdirect 175x print server Ethernet LAN

8specifications compared
3differ
5identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

LED indicators: Yes on the DYMO LabelWriter Print Server, Power, USB on the HP Jetdirect 175x print server Ethernet LAN.

LED indicators
- LabelWriter Print Server:Yes
- Jetdirect 175x print server Ethernet LAN:Power, USB

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LabelWriter Print Server, 175x
33 specifications	A DYMO LabelWriter Print Server View product	B HP Jetdirect 175x print server Ethernet LAN Model 175x View product
Features1 differ
Internal	No	No
LED indicatorsDiffers	Yes	Power, USB
IPP supportKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Country of originKnown for one	Taiwan	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memoryidentical
Flash memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 MB
Networkidentical
Network connection type	Ethernet LAN	Ethernet LAN
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10,100 Mbit/s
Protocolsidentical
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, AppleTalk, LPD, Telnet, SLP, IGMP, BOOTP/DHCP, WINS, SNMP, HTTP
Web-based managementKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports	1	1
USB 2.0 ports quantity	1	1
Parallel ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Serial ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
Software2 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows Vista Business, Windows Vista Business x64, Windows Vista Home Basic, Windows Vista Home Basic x64, Windows Vista Home Premium, Windows Vista Home Premium x64, Windows Vista Ultimate, Windows Vista Ultimate x64, Windows XP Home, Windows XP Home x64, Windows XP Professional, Windows XP Profes	Windows 2000, Windows Vista Business, Windows Vista Business x64, Windows Vista Enterprise, Windows Vista Enterprise x64, Windows Vista Home Basic, Windows Vista Home Basic x64, Windows Vista Home Premium, Windows Vista Home Premium x64, Windows Vista Ultimate, Windows Vista Ultimate x64, Windows XP
Mac operating systems supportedDiffers	Mac OS X 10.3 Panther, Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion	Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar, Mac OS X 10.3 Panther, Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	127 mm
HeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	38.1 mm
WidthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	101.6 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	90 g
System requirementsidentical
Minimum system requirements	CD-ROM	CD-ROM
Minimum storage drive spaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	40 MB
Other featuresidentical
Cabling technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10/100Base-T(X)
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows Server 2003
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Fast Ethernet
Customs codeKnown for one	8443321000	Unknown — not stated by the source
InterfaceKnown for one	USB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Network readyKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package typeKnown for one	Box	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one	175 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	235 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	68 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	390 g	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More print server comparisons

All print server comparisons