Product comparison · 2 powerline network adapters

TP-Link TL-PA7010P KIT vs TP-Link TL-PA8010P KIT(EU)

Add a product
  • 35specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 27identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link TL-PA8010P KIT(EU) has 300 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the TP-Link TL-PA7010P KIT (1300 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The TP-Link TL-PA8010P KIT(EU) has 3.51 W more power consumption (typical) than the TP-Link TL-PA7010P KIT (6 W vs 2.49 W). The TP-Link TL-PA8010P KIT(EU) has 0.05 W more power consumption (standby) than the TP-Link TL-PA7010P KIT (0.5 W vs 0.45 W).

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • TL-PA7010P KIT:1000 Mbit/s
    • TL-PA8010P KIT(EU):1300 Mbit/s
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • TL-PA7010P KIT:2.49 W
    • TL-PA8010P KIT(EU):6 W
  • Power consumption (standby)
    • TL-PA7010P KIT:0.45 W
    • TL-PA8010P KIT(EU):0.5 W
  • Width
    • TL-PA7010P KIT:126.3 mm
    • TL-PA8010P KIT(EU):42 mm
  • Depth
    • TL-PA7010P KIT:70 mm
    • TL-PA8010P KIT(EU):72 mm
  • Height
    • TL-PA7010P KIT:42 mm
    • TL-PA8010P KIT(EU):131 mm
  • Package weight
    • TL-PA7010P KIT:770 g
    • TL-PA8010P KIT(EU):700 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TL-PA7010P KIT, TL-PA8010P KIT(EU)
44 specifications
Performance1 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers1000 Mbit/s1300 Mbit/s
Ethernet LANYesYes
Ethernet LAN interface typeGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
Ethernet LAN data rates10,100,1000 Mbit/s10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports11
Networking standardsIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3uIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u
Power plugKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceType E / F
Built-in power socketYesYes
PowerLine standardHomePlug AV2HomePlug AV2
ModulationOFDMOFDM
Security algorithms128-bit AES128-bit AES
Maximum operating distance300 m300 m
Plug and PlayYesYes
Wi-FiKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Encryption buttonKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs2.49 W6 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.45 W0.5 W
AC input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source220 V
AC input frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 Hz
Designidentical
LED indicatorsLAN, PLC, PowerLAN, PLC, Power
Product colourWhiteWhite
CertificationCECE
System requirements1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10 Education, Windows 10 Education x64, Windows 10 Enterprise, Windows 10 Enterprise x64, Windows 10 Home, Windows 10 Home x64, Windows 10 IOT Core, Windows 10 Pro, Windows 10 Pro x64, Windows 2000, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows 7 Enterprise, Windows 7 Enterprise x64, Windows 7 Home BasWindows 2000, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows XP
Linux operating systems supportedYesYes
Mac compatibilityYesYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-40 - 70 °C-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)10 - 90%10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)5 - 90%5 - 90%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers126.3 mm42 mm
DepthDiffers70 mm72 mm
HeightDiffers42 mm131 mm
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesRoHSRoHS
Packaging data1 differ
Package width230 mm230 mm
Package depth190 mm190 mm
Package height100 mm100 mm
Package weightDiffers770 g700 g
Package typeKnown for oneBoxUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per pack2 pc(s)2 pc(s)
Quick installation guideYesYes
Cables includedLAN (RJ-45)LAN (RJ-45)
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source85171800

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More powerline network adapter comparisons

All powerline network adapter comparisons