Product comparison · 2 powerline network adapters

NETGEAR PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) vs TP-Link AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender

20specifications compared
9differ
11identical
33known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender has 300 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the NETGEAR PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) (1300 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The TP-Link AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender has 2 more Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports than the NETGEAR PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) (3 vs 1). The TP-Link AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender has 7.43 W more power consumption (typical) than the NETGEAR PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) (11 W vs 3.57 W). Only the TP-Link AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender has Wi-Fi. LED indicators: Yes on the NETGEAR PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s), Activity, LAN, Power, WLAN on the TP-Link AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender.

Maximum data transfer rate
- PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s):1000 Mbit/s
- AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender:1300 Mbit/s
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s):1
- AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender:3
Wi-Fi
- PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s):No
- AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender:Yes
Power consumption (typical)
- PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s):3.57 W
- AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender:11 W
LED indicators
- PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s):Yes
- AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender:Activity, LAN, Power, WLAN
Width
- PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s):58 mm
- AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender:75 mm
Height
- PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s):120 mm
- AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender:152 mm
Quantity per pack
- PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s):2 pc(s)
- AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender:1 pc(s)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PLP1000, TL-WPA8631P
53 specifications	A NETGEAR PLP1000 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) Model PLP1000 View product	B TP-Link AV1300 Gigabit Passthrough Powerline ac Wi-Fi Extender Model TL-WPA8631P View product
Performance4 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers	1000 Mbit/s	1300 Mbit/s
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one	10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	1	3
Wi-FiDiffers	No	Yes
Networking standardsDiffers	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u	IEEE 1901, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u
PowerLine standardKnown for one	HomePlug AV / HomePlug Green PHY	Unknown — not stated by the source
Top Wi-Fi standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
WLAN data transfer rates supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300,867 Mbit/s
Power plugKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Type G
ModulationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	OFDM
Security algorithmsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	128-bit AES, WEP, WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 m
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	3.57 W	11 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.464 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsDiffers	Yes	Activity, LAN, Power, WLAN
Antenna typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Internal
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, RoHS
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	58 mm	75 mm
HeightDiffers	120 mm	152 mm
WeightKnown for one	180.4 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	185 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	166 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	82 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	640 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Box
Packaging content1 differ
Quantity per packDiffers	2 pc(s)	1 pc(s)
Logistics dataidentical
Layers per pallet (air)Known for one	3 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Layers per pallet (sea)Known for one	5 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Master (outer) cases per pallet layerKnown for one	12 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case net weightKnown for one	7.52 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case widthKnown for one	45.8 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case lengthKnown for one	19.7 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Shipping (inner) case heightKnown for one	40 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Products per shipping (inner) caseKnown for one	10 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac compatibilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More powerline network adapter comparisons

All powerline network adapter comparisons