All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 powerline network adapters

NETGEAR PLP1000-100PAS PowerLine network adapter 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) vs TP-Link TL-PA8033P KIT

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 7identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The TP-Link TL-PA8033P KIT has 300 Mbit/s more maximum data transfer rate than the NETGEAR PLP1000-100PAS PowerLine network adapter 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) (1300 Mbit/s vs 1000 Mbit/s). The TP-Link TL-PA8033P KIT has 1.75 W more power consumption (typical) than the NETGEAR PLP1000-100PAS PowerLine network adapter 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) (5.32 W vs 3.57 W). The TP-Link TL-PA8033P KIT has 0.896 W more power consumption (standby) than the NETGEAR PLP1000-100PAS PowerLine network adapter 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s) (1.36 W vs 0.464 W). LED indicators: Yes on the NETGEAR PLP1000-100PAS PowerLine network adapter 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s), LAN, PLC, Power on the TP-Link TL-PA8033P KIT.

  • Maximum data transfer rate
    • 1000 Mbit/s
    • 1300 Mbit/s
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 3.57 W
    • 5.32 W
  • Power consumption (standby)
    • 0.464 W
    • 1.36 W
  • LED indicators
    • Yes
    • LAN, PLC, Power
  • Width
    • 58 mm
    • 131 mm
  • Depth
    • 42 mm
    • 72 mm
  • Height
    • 120 mm
    • 42 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
40 specifications
A

NETGEAR

PLP1000-100PAS PowerLine network adapter 1000 Mbit/s Ethernet LAN White 2 pc(s)

Model PLP1000-100PAS

View product
B

TP-Link

TL-PA8033P KITView product
Performance2 differ
Maximum data transfer rateDiffers1000 Mbit/s1300 Mbit/s
Ethernet LANYesYes
Ethernet LAN interface typeGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
Wi-FiNoNo
Networking standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3uIEEE 1901, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u
Power plugKnown for oneType G
Built-in power socketYesYes
ModulationKnown for oneOFDM
Maximum operating distanceKnown for one300 m
Encryption buttonYesYes
MIMOKnown for oneYes
MIMO typeKnown for oneMulti User MIMO
Plug and PlayYesYes
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one10,100,1000 Mbit/s
Copper ethernet cabling technologyKnown for one10BASE-T, 100BASE-TX, 1000BASE-T
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one1
PowerLine standardKnown for oneHomePlug AV / HomePlug Green PHY
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs3.57 W5.32 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.464 W1.36 W
CurrentKnown for one16 A
Power over Ethernet (PoE)Known for oneNo
Design1 differ
LED indicatorsDiffersYesLAN, PLC, Power
Product colourWhiteWhite
System requirementsidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 2000, Windows XP
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Mac compatibilityKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-40 - 70 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers58 mm131 mm
DepthDiffers42 mm72 mm
HeightDiffers120 mm42 mm
WeightKnown for one180.4 g
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneRoHS
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85171800
Packaging contentidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one2 pc(s)
Quick installation guideKnown for oneYes
Cables includedKnown for oneLAN (RJ-45)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More powerline network adapter comparisons

All powerline network adapter comparisons