Product comparison · 2 power banks

Samsung EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige vs Ugreen Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh

12specifications compared
8differ
4identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige has 2 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the Ugreen Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh (3 vs 1). The Samsung EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige has 83 mm more width than the Ugreen Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh (152 mm vs 69 mm). The Samsung EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige has 5.5 mm more depth than the Ugreen Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh (25.5 mm vs 20 mm). Product colour: Beige on the Samsung EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige, Grey on the Ugreen Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh. Charger compatibility: Universal on the Samsung EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige, Mobile phone/Smartphone on the Ugreen Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh.

Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
- EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige:3
- Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh:1
Product colour
- EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige:Beige
- Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh:Grey
Charger compatibility
- EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige:Universal
- Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh:Mobile phone/Smartphone
Width
- EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige:152 mm
- Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh:69 mm
Depth
- EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige:25.5 mm
- Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh:20 mm
Height
- EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige:76 mm
- Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh:105 mm
Weight
- EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige:402 g
- Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh:217 g
Battery capacity
- EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige:20000 mAh
- Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh:10000 mAh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of EB-P4520, Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh
29 specifications	A Samsung EB-P4520 20000 mAh Beige Model EB-P4520 View product	B Ugreen Powerbank 45763, 10000mAh View product
Design3 differ
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs	3	1
Product colourDiffers	Beige	Grey
Charger compatibilityDiffers	Universal	Mobile phone/Smartphone
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compatible productsKnown for one	Super Fast Charging : Galaxy S10 5G, Galaxy Note10, Galaxy Z Fold2, Galaxy Z Flip3 & Later // Galaxy A90 5G, A80, A70, A52, A33, A23, A05, A15 & Later // Galaxy M31s, M51, M62, M23, M53, M14 & Later // Galaxy Tab S7 & Later*Super Fast Charging 2.0 : Galaxy Note 10+, Galaxy S20 Ultra, Galaxy S22+,	Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Silicone
Performanceidentical
Charging source	USB	USB
Built-in radio	No	No
Fast charging	Yes	Yes
Fast charging technologyKnown for one	Power Delivery 3.0, Quick Charge 2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one	45 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
MagSafe compatibleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Wireless chargingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
Input interface	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for one	3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Input voltageKnown for one	9 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output voltageKnown for one	20 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output currentKnown for one	3 mA	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C charging portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Total output powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 W
Wireless charging powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	152 mm	69 mm
DepthDiffers	25.5 mm	20 mm
HeightDiffers	76 mm	105 mm
WeightDiffers	402 g	217 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentKnown for one	Battery Pack, USB-C to USB-C charging Cable	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery1 differ
Battery capacityDiffers	20000 mAh	10000 mAh

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power bank comparisons

All power bank comparisons