Product comparison · 2 power banks

Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) vs TERRA 8000024 power bank

14specifications compared
7differ
7identical
22known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) has 1 more USB Type-A output ports than the TERRA 8000024 power bank (2 vs 1). The TERRA 8000024 power bank has 1 more USB Type-C ports quantity than the Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) (2 vs 1). The TERRA 8000024 power bank has 126 mm more width than the Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) (155 mm vs 29 mm). Product colour: Anthracite on the Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo), Silver on the TERRA 8000024 power bank.

Product colour
- 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):Anthracite
- 8000024 power bank:Silver
USB Type-A output ports
- 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):2
- 8000024 power bank:1
USB Type-C ports quantity
- 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):1
- 8000024 power bank:2
Width
- 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):29 mm
- 8000024 power bank:155 mm
Depth
- 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):74 mm
- 8000024 power bank:70 mm
Height
- 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):144 mm
- 8000024 power bank:26.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 00201777, 8000024
36 specifications	A Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) Model 00201777 View product	B TERRA 8000024 power bank Model 8000024 View product
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffers	Anthracite	Silver
Charger compatibilityDiffers	Mobile phone/Smartphone, Tablet, Portable speaker, Smartwatch, Digital camera, Headphones/Headset	Universal
Built-in displayKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for one	LED	Unknown — not stated by the source
ShapeKnown for one	Rectangle	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Wireless chargingKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery charge time (USB)Known for one	8.1 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB Type-A connectorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A output portsDiffers	2	1
USB Type-C connectorKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C ports quantityDiffers	1	2
Poweridentical
USB Type-C charging portKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Known for one	15 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C required charging power (max)Known for one	15 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Output voltageKnown for one	5 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
Port 1 output currentKnown for one	3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Port 2 output currentKnown for one	3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Port 3 output currentKnown for one	3 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for one	Overcharge, Over voltage, Overheating, Short circuit	Unknown — not stated by the source
Total output powerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	165 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers	29 mm	155 mm
DepthDiffers	74 mm	70 mm
HeightDiffers	144 mm	26.6 mm
WeightKnown for one	431 g	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one	0.3 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	USB Type-A to USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Quantity per packKnown for one	1 pc(s)	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery technologyKnown for one	Lithium Polymer (LiPo)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power bank comparisons

All power bank comparisons