Product comparison · 2 power banks

Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) vs Hama Roll Up 20

Add a product
  • 26specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 18identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) has 5.8 h more battery charge time (USB) than the Hama Roll Up 20 (8.1 h vs 2.3 h). The Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) has 1 more USB Type-A output ports than the Hama Roll Up 20 (2 vs 1). The Hama Roll Up 20 has 5 mm more width than the Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) (34 mm vs 29 mm). Battery technology: Lithium Polymer (LiPo) on the Hama 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo), Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) on the Hama Roll Up 20.

  • Battery charge time (USB)
    • 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):8.1 h
    • Roll Up 20:2.3 h
  • USB Type-A output ports
    • 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):2
    • Roll Up 20:1
  • Width
    • 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):29 mm
    • Roll Up 20:34 mm
  • Depth
    • 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):74 mm
    • Roll Up 20:52.1 mm
  • Height
    • 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):144 mm
    • Roll Up 20:152.8 mm
  • Weight
    • 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):431 g
    • Roll Up 20:425.8 g
  • Battery technology
    • 00201777 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):Lithium Polymer (LiPo)
    • Roll Up 20:Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00201777, Roll Up 20
37 specifications
Design1 differ
Charger compatibilityDiffersMobile phone/Smartphone, Tablet, Portable speaker, Smartwatch, Digital camera, Headphones/HeadsetUniversal
Performance1 differ
Built-in radioKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Battery charge time (USB)Differs8.1 h2.3 h
Fast charging technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceQuick Charge 3.0, Power Delivery 3.0
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB Type-A output portsDiffers21
Poweridentical
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Known for one15 WUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C required charging power (max)Known for one15 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Output voltageKnown for one5 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Port 1 output currentKnown for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Port 2 output currentKnown for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Port 3 output currentKnown for one3 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Total output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source45 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers29 mm34 mm
DepthDiffers74 mm52.1 mm
HeightDiffers144 mm152.8 mm
WeightDiffers431 g425.8 g
Cable lengthKnown for one0.3 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUSB Type-A to USB Type-CUnknown — not stated by the source
Battery1 differ
Battery technologyDiffersLithium Polymer (LiPo)Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power bank comparisons

All power bank comparisons