Product comparison · 2 power banks

Hama 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) vs Ugreen PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo)

Add a product
  • 13specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 6identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The Hama 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) has 1 more USB Type-A output ports than the Ugreen PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo) (2 vs 1). The Hama 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) has 174 mm more width than the Ugreen PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo) (280 mm vs 106 mm). The Ugreen PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo) has 4 mm more depth than the Hama 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo) (72 mm vs 68 mm). Product colour: Black on the Hama 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo), Grey on the Ugreen PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo). Charger compatibility: Universal on the Hama 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo), Mobile phone/Smartphone on the Ugreen PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo).

  • Product colour
    • 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):Black
    • PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo):Grey
  • Charger compatibility
    • 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):Universal
    • PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo):Mobile phone/Smartphone
  • USB Type-A output ports
    • 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):2
    • PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo):1
  • Width
    • 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):280 mm
    • PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo):106 mm
  • Depth
    • 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):68 mm
    • PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo):72 mm
  • Height
    • 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):136 mm
    • PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo):33 mm
  • Weight
    • 00201754 power bank Lithium Polymer (LiPo):389 g
    • PB567 Lithium Polymer (LiPo):368 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 00201754, PB567
25 specifications
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackGrey
Charger compatibilityDiffersUniversalMobile phone/Smartphone
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Performanceidentical
Wireless chargingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB Type-A output portsDiffers21
USB Type-A connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB Type-C connectorKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
USB Type-C charging portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Output currentKnown for one2.4 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Output voltageKnown for one5 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Port 1 output currentKnown for one2.4 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Port 2 output currentKnown for one2.4 AUnknown — not stated by the source
Power protection featuresKnown for oneShort circuit, Overdischarge, OverchargeUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers280 mm106 mm
DepthDiffers68 mm72 mm
HeightDiffers136 mm33 mm
WeightDiffers389 g368 g
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB Type-C
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power bank comparisons

All power bank comparisons