Product comparison · 2 power banks

Cellularline Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000 vs TERRA 8000024 power bank

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 10identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The TERRA 8000024 power bank has 150 W more total output power than the Cellularline Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000 (165 W vs 15 W). The TERRA 8000024 power bank has 124 mm more width than the Cellularline Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000 (155 mm vs 31 mm). The Cellularline Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000 has 0.7 mm more depth than the TERRA 8000024 power bank (70.7 mm vs 70 mm). Product colour: Black on the Cellularline Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000, Silver on the TERRA 8000024 power bank.

  • Product colour
    • Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000:Black
    • 8000024 power bank:Silver
  • Total output power
    • Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000:15 W
    • 8000024 power bank:165 W
  • Width
    • Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000:31 mm
    • 8000024 power bank:155 mm
  • Depth
    • Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000:70.7 mm
    • 8000024 power bank:70 mm
  • Height
    • Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000:109 mm
    • 8000024 power bank:26.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of PBESS02PROMO20000K, 8000024
40 specifications
A

Cellularline

Power Bank Essence Promo 20.000

Model PBESS02PROMO20000K

View product
Design1 differ
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)33
Product colourDiffersBlackSilver
Charger compatibilityUniversalUniversal
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes, ChargingUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Charging sourceUSBUSB
Wireless chargingKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Built-in radioNoNo
Fast chargingYesYes
Fast charging technologyKnown for onePower DeliveryUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)YesYes
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for one18 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Input interfaceUSB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB Type-A output ports11
USB Type-C ports quantity22
Power1 differ
USB Type-C charging portKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C required charging power (min)Known for one0 WUnknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-C required charging power (max)Known for one0 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Total output powerDiffers15 W165 W
Port 1 output powerKnown for one18 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Port 2 output powerKnown for one20 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Port 3 output powerKnown for one18 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
UN numberKnown for oneUN3480Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions3 differ
WidthDiffers31 mm155 mm
DepthDiffers70.7 mm70 mm
HeightDiffers109 mm26.6 mm
WeightKnown for one374 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Cable lengthKnown for one0.15 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneUSB Type-CUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter includedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteries includedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one34 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one90 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one198 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one393 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
BluetoothKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery capacity20000 mAh20000 mAh
Battery weightKnown for one298 gUnknown — not stated by the source
Technical detailsidentical
Brand compatibilityKnown for oneUniversalUnknown — not stated by the source
Radio Equipment Directive (RED)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one2 year(s)Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power bank comparisons

All power bank comparisons