Product comparison · 2 power banks

Accezz SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) vs Targus HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 4identical
  • 20known for one product only

Key differences

The Accezz SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) has 2 more simultaneously connected devices (max) than the Targus HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W (4 vs 2). The Targus HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W has 75 g more weight than the Accezz SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) (270 g vs 195 g). The Accezz SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion) has 5,000 mAh more battery capacity than the Targus HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W (10000 mAh vs 5000 mAh). Product colour: Black on the Accezz SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion), Blue on the Targus HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W. Input interface: Lightning + USB Type-C on the Accezz SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion), USB Type-C on the Targus HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W.

  • Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)
    • SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion):4
    • HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W:2
  • Product colour
    • SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion):Black
    • HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W:Blue
  • Input interface
    • SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion):Lightning + USB Type-C
    • HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W:USB Type-C
  • Weight
    • SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion):195 g
    • HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W:270 g
  • Cables included
    • SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion):USB Type-C, Lightning
    • HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W:USB Type-C
  • Battery capacity
    • SH00098563 power bank Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion):10000 mAh
    • HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W:5000 mAh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of SH00098563, HyperJuice Flex 10K 30W
31 specifications
Design3 differ
Number of simultaneously connected devices (max)Differs42
Product colourDiffersBlackBlue
Charger compatibilityDiffersUniversalLaptop/netbook, Headphones/Headset, Mobile phone/Smartphone, Tablet, Portable gaming console
Built-in displayYesYes
Display typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLED
Housing materialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Charging sourceUSBUSB
Battery capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36 Wh
Fast chargingYesYes
USB Power Delivery (USB PD)YesYes
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Wireless chargingKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Fast charging technologyKnown for oneQuick Charge 3.0Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Input interfaceDiffersLightning + USB Type-CUSB Type-C
USB Type-A output portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB Type-C ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
USB Type-C connectorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Lightning connectorKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Total output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Port 1 output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 W
Port 2 output powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 mm
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source150 mm
WeightDiffers195 g270 g
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffersUSB Type-C, LightningUSB Type-C
Quantity per packKnown for one1 pc(s)Unknown — not stated by the source
Battery1 differ
Battery capacityDiffers10000 mAh5000 mAh
Battery technologyKnown for oneLithium-Ion (Li-Ion)Unknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Technical detailsidentical
MaterialKnown for onePlasticUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power bank comparisons

All power bank comparisons