Product comparison · 2 power adapters & inverters

Dell 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor vs HP 65W GaN Wall Charger

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 5identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

The Dell 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor has 295 W more output power than the HP 65W GaN Wall Charger (360 W vs 65 W). The Dell 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor has 21.1 mm more width than the HP 65W GaN Wall Charger (86.1 mm vs 65 mm). The HP 65W GaN Wall Charger has 6.6 mm more depth than the Dell 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor (32 mm vs 25.4 mm). Weight: 1 kg on the Dell 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor, 115 g on the HP 65W GaN Wall Charger.

  • Output power
    • 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor:360 W
    • 65W GaN Wall Charger:65 W
  • Width
    • 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor:86.1 mm
    • 65W GaN Wall Charger:65 mm
  • Depth
    • 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor:25.4 mm
    • 65W GaN Wall Charger:32 mm
  • Height
    • 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor:189 mm
    • 65W GaN Wall Charger:32 mm
  • Weight
    • 492-BFDH power adapter/inverter Indoor:1 kg
    • 65W GaN Wall Charger:115 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 492-BFDH, 65W GaN Wall Charger
33 specifications
Features2 differ
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source115/230 V
Input currentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.6 A
Output powerDiffers360 W65 W
EfficiencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source89%
USB Power Delivery up toKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source65 W
CompatibilityDiffersAlienware 16 Area-51 AA16250 Alienware 18 Area-51 AA18250 Alienware m16 R1 (AMD) Alienware m18 R1 (AMD) Alienware M18 R2 Alienware x16 R2Supports up to 65 W power delivery
HP segmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBusiness
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 35 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source-20 - 85 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 95%
Certificatesidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCECP, CCC, EAC, BIS, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), CE, BSMI
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceForest Stewardship Council (FSC)
Sustainable technologies and materialsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFSC Certified Packaging; 90% post-consumer recycled plastic
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers86.1 mm65 mm
DepthDiffers25.4 mm32 mm
HeightDiffers189 mm32 mm
WeightDiffers1 kg115 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source153 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source124 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source58 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source310 g
Brand-specific featuresidentical
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source199642433373, 199642433397
HP GTIN (EAN/UPC) with optionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source(ABB) 199642433373; (ABU) 199642433397
Technical detailsidentical
General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) URLKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcehttps://support.hp.com/us-en/document/ish_6126692-6126777-16?openCLC=true
Box contentsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC power adapter; USB Type-C cable, Product notice; Warranty card; Quick start guide
Logistics dataidentical
Country of originKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceChina
Other featuresidentical
TypeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePower-Adapter
UNSPSC-codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source39121006

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power adapters & inverters comparisons

All power adapters & inverters comparisons