Product comparison · 2 power adapters & inverters

2-Power AC Adapter 18-20v vs HP iPAQ Mini-USB Travel Kit

Add a product
  • 4specifications compared
  • 3differ
  • 1identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

  • Weight
    • AC Adapter 18-20v:265 g
    • iPAQ Mini-USB Travel Kit:42 g
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • AC Adapter 18-20v:113 x 49 x 29 mm
    • iPAQ Mini-USB Travel Kit:90 x 35 x 28 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CAA0668A, iPAQ Mini-USB Travel Kit
15 specifications
A

2-Power

AC Adapter 18-20v

Model CAA0668A

View product
Features1 differ
Input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Output voltageKnown for one18 VUnknown — not stated by the source
CompatibilityDiffersAcer Travel M 342iPAQ 114 Classic Handheld iPAQ 214 Enterprise Handheld iPAQ 614 Business Navigator iPAQ 614c Business Navigator iPAQ 914c Business Messenger iPAQ rw6815 Personal Messenger iPAQ rx5700 Travel Companion
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one49 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one118 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one32 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers265 g42 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one128 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one190 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one54 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85044095Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs113 x 49 x 29 mm90 x 35 x 28 mm
Size (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source9.02 cm (3.55")
Weight (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.48 oz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power adapters & inverters comparisons

All power adapters & inverters comparisons