Product comparison · 2 power adapters & inverters

2-Power AC Adapter 75W 15-17v 4.3A inc. mains cable vs HP iPAQ Mini-USB Auto Adapter

Add a product
  • 2specifications compared
  • 2differ
  • 0identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

  • Output voltage
    • AC Adapter 75W 15-17v 4.3A inc. mains cable:15 V
    • iPAQ Mini-USB Auto Adapter:5 V
  • Weight
    • AC Adapter 75W 15-17v 4.3A inc. mains cable:274 g
    • iPAQ Mini-USB Auto Adapter:127.01 g

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of CAA0625A, iPAQ Mini-USB Auto Adapter
17 specifications
Features1 differ
Output voltageDiffers15 V5 V
Input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 V
Poweridentical
Power adapter capacityKnown for one3500 mAhUnknown — not stated by the source
CapacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 W
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WidthKnown for one49 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
DepthKnown for one113 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one29 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightDiffers274 g127.01 g
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one130 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one189 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one56 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one85044095Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one100 x 60 x 30 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcemini USB
UNSPSC-codeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source26111722
Weight (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.48 oz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More power adapters & inverters comparisons

All power adapters & inverters comparisons