Product comparison · 2 pos systems

HP Engage Flex Pro G2 vs SumUp POS Lite 2.0

16specifications compared
15differ
1identical
49known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Engage Flex Pro G2 has 0.4 GHz more processor frequency than the SumUp POS Lite 2.0 (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The HP Engage Flex Pro G2 has 12 GB more internal memory than the SumUp POS Lite 2.0 (16 GB vs 4 GB). The HP Engage Flex Pro G2 has 18.7 mm more width than the SumUp POS Lite 2.0 (337 mm vs 318.3 mm). Only the HP Engage Flex Pro G2 has Ethernet LAN. Only the SumUp POS Lite 2.0 has Bluetooth.

Processor frequency
- Engage Flex Pro G2:2.4 GHz
- POS Lite 2.0:2 GHz
Internal memory
- Engage Flex Pro G2:16 GB
- POS Lite 2.0:4 GB
Internal memory type
- Engage Flex Pro G2:DDR5-SDRAM
- POS Lite 2.0:LPDDR4x-SDRAM
Total storage capacity
- Engage Flex Pro G2:1 TB
- POS Lite 2.0:32 GB
Storage media
- Engage Flex Pro G2:SSD
- POS Lite 2.0:eMMC
Ethernet LAN
- Engage Flex Pro G2:Yes
- POS Lite 2.0:No
Bluetooth
- Engage Flex Pro G2:No
- POS Lite 2.0:Yes
Wi-Fi
- Engage Flex Pro G2:No
- POS Lite 2.0:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Engage Flex Pro G2, POS Lite 2.0
65 specifications	A HP Engage Flex Pro G2 View product	B SumUp POS Lite 2.0 View product
Processor1 differ
Processor manufacturerKnown for one	Intel	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor familyKnown for one	Intel® Core™ i5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor generationKnown for one	13th gen Intel® Core™ i5	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor modelKnown for one	i5-13500E	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor coresKnown for one	14	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor threadsKnown for one	20	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor boost frequencyKnown for one	4.6 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor frequencyDiffers	2.4 GHz	2 GHz
Performance coresKnown for one	6	Unknown — not stated by the source
Efficient coresKnown for one	8	Unknown — not stated by the source
Efficient-core Max Turbo FrequencyKnown for one	3.3 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processor cacheKnown for one	24 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Motherboard chipsetKnown for one	Intel Q670E	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory2 differ
Internal memoryDiffers	16 GB	4 GB
Internal memory typeDiffers	DDR5-SDRAM	LPDDR4x-SDRAM
Maximum internal memoryKnown for one	128 GB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of memory slotsKnown for one	4	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory slots typeKnown for one	DIMM	Unknown — not stated by the source
Memory clock speedKnown for one	4800 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage2 differ
Total storage capacityDiffers	1 TB	32 GB
Storage mediaDiffers	SSD	eMMC
NVMeKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
SSD capacityKnown for one	512 GB	Unknown — not stated by the source
SSD interfaceKnown for one	PCI Express	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Audio systemKnown for one	Conexant ALC3252	Unknown — not stated by the source
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of speakersKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Network3 differ
Ethernet LANDiffers	Yes	No
Ethernet LAN data ratesKnown for one	10,1000,2500,100 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothDiffers	No	Yes
Wi-FiDiffers	No	Yes
Wi-Fi standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantity	2	2
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantityKnown for one	5	Unknown — not stated by the source
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Serial ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design2 differ
Chassis typeDiffers	SFF	All-in-One
Number of 3.5" baysKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	Black	White
Software1 differ
Operating system installedDiffers	Windows 11 Pro	Android 15
Operating system architectureKnown for one	64-bit	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
AC input voltageKnown for one	100 - 240 V	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one	50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 W
Power supplyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	65 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 85%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	10 - 40 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	0 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-30 - 65 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	337 mm	318.3 mm
DepthDiffers	384 mm	134.3 mm
HeightDiffers	100 mm	224.6 mm
WeightDiffers	4.7 kg	2.41 kg
Displayidentical
Display diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33.8 cm (13.3")
Display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1080 pixels
Second displayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Second display diagonalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20.3 cm (8")
Second display resolutionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	800 x 1280 pixels
Featuresidentical
Housing materialKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), Polycarbonate (PC)
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	370 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	288 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	150 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.57 kg
Technical detailsidentical
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 year(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos system comparisons

All pos system comparisons