Product comparison · 2 pos printers

Epson TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer vs Epson TM-U220IIB (102)

24specifications compared
5differ
19identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

The Epson TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer has 1.3 lps more print speed than the Epson TM-U220IIB (102) (6 lps vs 4.7 lps). The Epson TM-U220IIB (102) has 0.5 mm more height than the Epson TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer (139 mm vs 138.5 mm). Only the Epson TM-U220IIB (102) has serial interface. Only the Epson TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer has Ethernet LAN. Product colour: Grey on the Epson TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer, Dark Grey on the Epson TM-U220IIB (102).

Print speed
- TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer:6 lps
- TM-U220IIB (102):4.7 lps
Serial interface
- TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer:No
- TM-U220IIB (102):Yes
Ethernet LAN
- TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer:Yes
- TM-U220IIB (102):No
Product colour
- TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer:Grey
- TM-U220IIB (102):Dark Grey
Height
- TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer:138.5 mm
- TM-U220IIB (102):139 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TM-U220IIB, TM-U220IIB (102)
50 specifications	A Epson TM-U220IIB Wired Dot matrix POS printer Model TM-U220IIB View product	B Epson TM-U220IIB (102)View product
Printing1 differ
Print speedDiffers	6 lps	4.7 lps
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB portKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Serial interfaceDiffers	No	Yes
Serial interface typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RS-232
InterfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RS-232, Drawer kick-out
Network1 differ
Ethernet LANDiffers	Yes	No
Featuresidentical
Page description languagesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ESC/POS
Autocutter durabilityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.8 million cuts
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Grey	Dark Grey
Weight & dimensions1 differ
HeightDiffers	138.5 mm	139 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Quantity per packKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 pc(s)
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 mm
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	22 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.84 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Products per palletKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	72 pc(s)
Products per pallet layerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8 pc(s)
Pallet gross widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	80 cm
Pallet gross lengthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 cm
Pallet gross heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34.8 cm
Products per pallet (UK)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	108 pc(s)
Products per pallet layer (UK)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12 pc(s)
Pallet length (UK)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 cm
Pallet height (UK)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34.8 cm
Technical detailsidentical
TechnologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Serial Impact Dot Matrix
VoltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 V
Font stylesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ANK, Traditional Chinese, Simplified Chinese
Box contentsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC adapter, C, Main unit, Ribbon, Roll paper, User manual
Paper size roll paperKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	76.00 ± 0.50 (W) mm x dia 83.00 mm,<br>69.50 ± 0.50 (W) mm x dia 83.00 mm,<br>57.50 ± 0.50 (W) mm x dia 83.00 mm
Power consumptionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Printing: Appx.31 W, Standby: Appx.2 W
Other featuresidentical
Buffer sizeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 KB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos printer comparisons

All pos printer comparisons