Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

iiyama T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor vs Premier TM-156 Panoramic

Add a product
  • 7specifications compared
  • 5differ
  • 2identical
  • 25known for one product only

Key differences

The Premier TM-156 Panoramic has 80 cd/m² more display brightness than the iiyama T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor (300 cd/m² vs 220 cd/m²). The iiyama T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor has 20 - 80% more operating relative humidity (H-H) than the Premier TM-156 Panoramic (20 - 80% vs 0 - 80%). Display diagonal: 54.6 cm (21.5") on the iiyama T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor, 39.6 cm (15.6") on the Premier TM-156 Panoramic. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the iiyama T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor, 1366 x 768 pixels on the Premier TM-156 Panoramic. Operating temperature (T-T): 0 - 40 °C on the iiyama T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor, -10 - 60 °C on the Premier TM-156 Panoramic.

  • Display diagonal
    • T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
    • TM-156 Panoramic:39.6 cm (15.6")
  • Display resolution
    • T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
    • TM-156 Panoramic:1366 x 768 pixels
  • Display brightness
    • T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor:220 cd/m²
    • TM-156 Panoramic:300 cd/m²
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor:20 - 80%
    • TM-156 Panoramic:0 - 80%
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor:0 - 40 °C
    • TM-156 Panoramic:-10 - 60 °C

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of T2234MSC-B3X, TM-156 Panoramic
32 specifications
A

iiyama

T2234MSC-B3X POS monitor

Model T2234MSC-B3X

View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers54.6 cm (21.5")39.6 cm (15.6")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels1366 x 768 pixels
Display brightnessDiffers220 cd/m²300 cd/m²
TouchscreenYesYes
Touchscreen typeKnown for oneTabletopUnknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one1000:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Native aspect ratioKnown for one16:9Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel typeKnown for oneIPSUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.247 x 0.247 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Response timeKnown for one8 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one178°Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one178°Unknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD
LED backlightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Featuresidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50000 h
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 80%0 - 80%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs0 - 40 °C-10 - 60 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one10 - 90%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneCE, TÜV-Bauart, cULus, VCCI, CUUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceHDMI
Optional connectivityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB 2.0
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC
AC adapter input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 - 250 V
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source260 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source410 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.6 kg
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source425 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons