Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

iiyama T1532SR-B5 POS monitor vs iiyama T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor

Add a product
  • 16specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 5identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

The iiyama T1532SR-B5 POS monitor has 140 cd/m² more display brightness than the iiyama T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor (370 cd/m² vs 230 cd/m²). The iiyama T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor has 300 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the iiyama T1532SR-B5 POS monitor (1000:1 vs 700:1). The iiyama T1532SR-B5 POS monitor has 3 ms more response time than the iiyama T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor (8 ms vs 5 ms). Display diagonal: 38.1 cm (15") on the iiyama T1532SR-B5 POS monitor, 43.2 cm (17") on the iiyama T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor. Display resolution: 1024 x 768 pixels on the iiyama T1532SR-B5 POS monitor, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the iiyama T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • T1532SR-B5 POS monitor:38.1 cm (15")
    • T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor:43.2 cm (17")
  • Display resolution
    • T1532SR-B5 POS monitor:1024 x 768 pixels
    • T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Display brightness
    • T1532SR-B5 POS monitor:370 cd/m²
    • T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor:230 cd/m²
  • Touchscreen type
    • T1532SR-B5 POS monitor:Tabletop
    • T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor:Capacitive
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • T1532SR-B5 POS monitor:700:1
    • T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor:1000:1
  • Native aspect ratio
    • T1532SR-B5 POS monitor:4:3
    • T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor:5:4
  • Pixel pitch
    • T1532SR-B5 POS monitor:0.297 x 0.297 mm
    • T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor:0.264 x 0.264 mm
  • Response time
    • T1532SR-B5 POS monitor:8 ms
    • T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor:5 ms

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of T1532SR-B5, T1721MSC-B2-STD
33 specifications
B

iiyama

T1721MSC-B2-STD POS monitor

Model T1721MSC-B2-STD

View product
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers38.1 cm (15")43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers1024 x 768 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
HD typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSXGA
Display brightnessDiffers370 cd/m²230 cd/m²
TouchscreenYesYes
Touchscreen typeDiffersTabletopCapacitive
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs700:11000:1
Effective viewing areaKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source338 x 270.5 mm
Native aspect ratioDiffers4:35:4
Panel typeTNTN
Pixel pitchDiffers0.297 x 0.297 mm0.264 x 0.264 mm
Response timeDiffers8 ms5 ms
Surface hardnessKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7H
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers160°170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers170°160°
LED backlightKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Linux operating systems supportedYesYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Windows operating systems supportedYesYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceVGA (D-Sub) + HDMI + USB 2.0
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceDC
PowerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 W
AC adapter output voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12 V
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source198 mm
HeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source364 mm
WeightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4.4 kg
WidthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source392.5 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source172 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source500 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5.8 kg
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source537 mm
Certificates1 differ
CertificationDiffersCB, CE, TÜV-Bauart, CU, cULus, VCCI REACHCE, CB, TÜV type, CU, cULus

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons