Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

iggual MTL15PX POS monitor vs iiyama T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor

24specifications compared
11differ
13identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The iggual MTL15PX POS monitor has 20 cd/m² more display brightness than the iiyama T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor (250 cd/m² vs 230 cd/m²). The iggual MTL15PX POS monitor has 15 W more power than the iiyama T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor (35 W vs 20 W). The iiyama T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor has 165 mm more depth than the iggual MTL15PX POS monitor (198 mm vs 33 mm). Display diagonal: 39.6 cm (15.6") on the iggual MTL15PX POS monitor, 43.2 cm (17") on the iiyama T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor. Display resolution: 1600 x 900 pixels on the iggual MTL15PX POS monitor, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the iiyama T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor.

Display diagonal
- MTL15PX POS monitor:39.6 cm (15.6")
- T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor:43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution
- MTL15PX POS monitor:1600 x 900 pixels
- T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
HD type
- MTL15PX POS monitor:HD+
- T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor:SXGA
Display brightness
- MTL15PX POS monitor:250 cd/m²
- T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor:230 cd/m²
Native aspect ratio
- MTL15PX POS monitor:16:9
- T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor:5:4
Power
- MTL15PX POS monitor:35 W
- T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor:20 W
Depth
- MTL15PX POS monitor:33 mm
- T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor:198 mm
Height
- MTL15PX POS monitor:239 mm
- T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor:364 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of MTL15PX, T1721MSC-B2-REF
44 specifications	A iggual MTL15PX POS monitor Model MTL15PX View product	B iiyama T1721MSC-B2-REF POS monitor Model T1721MSC-B2-REF View product
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	39.6 cm (15.6")	43.2 cm (17")
Display resolutionDiffers	1600 x 900 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
HD typeDiffers	HD+	SXGA
Display typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightnessDiffers	250 cd/m²	230 cd/m²
Native aspect ratioDiffers	16:9	5:4
Native refresh rateKnown for one	75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Effective viewing areaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	338 x 270.5 mm
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.264 x 0.264 mm
Surface hardnessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7H
Features1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8	Yes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
PowerDiffers	35 W	20 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.1 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter frequencyKnown for one	50/60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter output currentKnown for one	4 A	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption per 1000 hoursKnown for one	9 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for one	D	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	D	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	33 mm	198 mm
HeightDiffers	239 mm	364 mm
WeightDiffers	5 kg	4.4 kg
WidthDiffers	375 mm	392.5 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	0 - 50 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	172 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.8 kg
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	537 mm
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, CB, TÜV type, CU, cULus

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons