Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

iggual MTL15CP POS monitor vs iiyama T1931SR-B5 POS monitor

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 6identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

The iggual MTL15CP POS monitor has 50 cd/m² more display brightness than the iiyama T1931SR-B5 POS monitor (250 cd/m² vs 200 cd/m²). The iggual MTL15CP POS monitor has 15 Hz more native refresh rate than the iiyama T1931SR-B5 POS monitor (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). The iiyama T1931SR-B5 POS monitor has 0.4 W more power consumption (standby) than the iggual MTL15CP POS monitor (0.5 W vs 0.1 W). Display diagonal: 39.6 cm (15.6") on the iggual MTL15CP POS monitor, 48.3 cm (19") on the iiyama T1931SR-B5 POS monitor. Display resolution: 1600 x 900 pixels on the iggual MTL15CP POS monitor, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the iiyama T1931SR-B5 POS monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • MTL15CP POS monitor:39.6 cm (15.6")
    • T1931SR-B5 POS monitor:48.3 cm (19")
  • Display resolution
    • MTL15CP POS monitor:1600 x 900 pixels
    • T1931SR-B5 POS monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • HD type
    • MTL15CP POS monitor:HD+
    • T1931SR-B5 POS monitor:SXGA
  • Display brightness
    • MTL15CP POS monitor:250 cd/m²
    • T1931SR-B5 POS monitor:200 cd/m²
  • Native aspect ratio
    • MTL15CP POS monitor:16:9
    • T1931SR-B5 POS monitor:5:4
  • Native refresh rate
    • MTL15CP POS monitor:75 Hz
    • T1931SR-B5 POS monitor:60 Hz
  • Power consumption (standby)
    • MTL15CP POS monitor:0.1 W
    • T1931SR-B5 POS monitor:0.5 W
  • Energy consumption per 1000 hours
    • MTL15CP POS monitor:9 kWh
    • T1931SR-B5 POS monitor:14.2 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of MTL15CP, T1931SR-B5
36 specifications
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers39.6 cm (15.6")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1600 x 900 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
HD typeDiffersHD+SXGA
Display brightnessDiffers250 cd/m²200 cd/m²
TouchscreenYesYes
Touchscreen typeKnown for oneResistiveUnknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)1000:11000:1
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:95:4
Native refresh rateDiffers75 Hz60 Hz
Number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
Panel typeKnown for oneTFT-LCDUnknown — not stated by the source
Response time5 ms5 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal170°170°
Viewing angle, vertical160°160°
Pixel pitchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.294 x 0.294 mm
Features1 differ
Product colourBlackBlack
Windows operating systems supportedDiffersWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8Yes
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for oneVGA (D-Sub) + HDMI + USB 2.0Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Power4 differ
Power source typeKnown for oneDCUnknown — not stated by the source
PowerKnown for one35 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.1 W0.5 W
AC adapter frequencyKnown for one50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter output currentKnown for one4 AUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter output voltageKnown for one12 VUnknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption per 1000 hoursDiffers9 kWh14.2 kWh
Energy efficiency class (HDR)DiffersDNot available
Energy efficiency class (SDR)DiffersDE
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for one33 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one239 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one5 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one375 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 50 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCB, CE, TÜV, VCCI, GOST

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons