Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display vs Premier TM-156 Panoramic

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 2identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display has 200 cd/m² more display brightness than the Premier TM-156 Panoramic (500 cd/m² vs 300 cd/m²). The Premier TM-156 Panoramic has 89.8 mm more depth than the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display (260 mm vs 170.2 mm). The Premier TM-156 Panoramic has 374.8 mm more height than the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display (410 mm vs 35.2 mm). Only the Premier TM-156 Panoramic has touchscreen. Display diagonal: 25.6 cm (10.1") on the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display, 39.6 cm (15.6") on the Premier TM-156 Panoramic.

  • Display diagonal
    • Engage One 10.1-inch Display:25.6 cm (10.1")
    • TM-156 Panoramic:39.6 cm (15.6")
  • Display resolution
    • Engage One 10.1-inch Display:1280 x 800 pixels
    • TM-156 Panoramic:1366 x 768 pixels
  • Display type
    • Engage One 10.1-inch Display:IPS
    • TM-156 Panoramic:LCD
  • Display brightness
    • Engage One 10.1-inch Display:500 cd/m²
    • TM-156 Panoramic:300 cd/m²
  • Touchscreen
    • Engage One 10.1-inch Display:No
    • TM-156 Panoramic:Yes
  • Interface
    • Engage One 10.1-inch Display:USB Type-C
    • TM-156 Panoramic:HDMI
  • Power source type
    • Engage One 10.1-inch Display:USB
    • TM-156 Panoramic:AC
  • Depth
    • Engage One 10.1-inch Display:170.2 mm
    • TM-156 Panoramic:260 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Engage One 10.1-inch Display, TM-156 Panoramic
36 specifications
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers25.6 cm (10.1")39.6 cm (15.6")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 800 pixels1366 x 768 pixels
HD typeKnown for oneWXGAUnknown — not stated by the source
Display typeDiffersIPSLCD
Display brightnessDiffers500 cd/m²300 cd/m²
TouchscreenDiffersNoYes
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one800:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Effective viewing areaKnown for one216.96 x 135.6 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
LED backlightYesYes
Native aspect ratioKnown for one16:10Unknown — not stated by the source
Native refresh rateKnown for one60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of coloursKnown for one16.1 million coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.1695 x 0.1695 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Response timeKnown for one25 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one170°Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one170°Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Country of originKnown for oneChinaUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50000 h
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB Type-CHDMI
Optional connectivityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB 2.0
Power1 differ
Power source typeDiffersUSBAC
PowerKnown for one15 WUnknown — not stated by the source
AC adapter input voltageKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source110 - 250 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers170.2 mm260 mm
HeightDiffers35.2 mm410 mm
WeightDiffers1.49 kg4.6 kg
WidthDiffers246.2 mm425 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one110 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one232 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one1.93 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthKnown for one306 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 80%0 - 80%
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs5 - 35 °C-10 - 60 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 95%Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons