Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display vs HP L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor

12specifications compared
10differ
2identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display has 280 cd/m² more display brightness than the HP L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor (500 cd/m² vs 220 cd/m²). The HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display has 128.7 mm more depth than the HP L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor (170.2 mm vs 41.5 mm). The HP L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor has 137 mm more height than the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display (172.2 mm vs 35.2 mm). Product colour: Black on the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display, Black, Silver on the HP L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor.

Display brightness
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:500 cd/m²
- L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor:220 cd/m²
Product colour
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:Black
- L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor:Black, Silver
Depth
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:170.2 mm
- L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor:41.5 mm
Height
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:35.2 mm
- L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor:172.2 mm
Weight
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:1.49 kg
- L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor:1.15 kg
Width
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:246.2 mm
- L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor:245.9 mm
Package depth
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:110 mm
- L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor:323 mm
Package height
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:232 mm
- L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor:266 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of Engage One 10.1-inch Display, L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor
33 specifications	A HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display View product	B HP L7010t 10.1-inch Retail Touch Monitor View product
Display1 differ
Display resolutionKnown for one	1280 x 800 pixels	Unknown — not stated by the source
HD typeKnown for one	WXGA	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display typeKnown for one	IPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightnessDiffers	500 cd/m²	220 cd/m²
TouchscreenKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	800:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Effective viewing areaKnown for one	216.96 x 135.6 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED backlightKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	16:10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Native refresh rateKnown for one	60 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Number of coloursKnown for one	16.1 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.1695 x 0.1695 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Response timeKnown for one	25 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	170°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	170°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	Black, Silver
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for one	USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for one	USB	Unknown — not stated by the source
PowerKnown for one	15 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers	170.2 mm	41.5 mm
HeightDiffers	35.2 mm	172.2 mm
WeightDiffers	1.49 kg	1.15 kg
WidthDiffers	246.2 mm	245.9 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package depthDiffers	110 mm	323 mm
Package heightDiffers	232 mm	266 mm
Package weightDiffers	1.93 kg	2.2 kg
Package widthDiffers	306 mm	490 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	5 - 35 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	5 - 95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons