All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

HP Engage 10 Display vs Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 14differ
  • 5identical
  • 24known for one product only

Key differences

The HP Engage 10 Display has 213 cd/m² more display brightness than the Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation (400 cd/m² vs 187 cd/m²). The Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation has 5 ms more response time than the HP Engage 10 Display (30 ms vs 25 ms). The HP Engage 10 Display has 135.2 mm more depth than the Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation (170.2 mm vs 35 mm). Display resolution: 1280 x 800 pixels on the HP Engage 10 Display, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation. Native aspect ratio: 16:10 on the HP Engage 10 Display, 16:9 on the Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation.

  • Display resolution
    • 1280 x 800 pixels
    • 1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Display brightness
    • 400 cd/m²
    • 187 cd/m²
  • Native aspect ratio
    • 16:10
    • 16:9
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.1692 x 0.1692 mm
    • 0.18 x 0.18 mm
  • Response time
    • 25 ms
    • 30 ms
  • Depth
    • 170.2 mm
    • 35 mm
  • Height
    • 16 mm
    • 241.1 mm
  • Weight
    • 656 g
    • 2.54 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
43 specifications
A

HP

Engage 10 DisplayView product
B

Viewsonic

XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation

Model XF1630

View product
Display5 differ
Display diagonalKnown for one39.6 cm (15.6")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 800 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeKnown for oneFull HD
Display brightnessDiffers400 cd/m²187 cd/m²
TouchscreenKnown for oneYes
Touchscreen typeKnown for oneProjected Capacitive (PCAP)
Effective viewing areaKnown for one344.16 x 193.59 mm
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:1016:9
Pixel pitchDiffers0.1692 x 0.1692 mm0.18 x 0.18 mm
Response timeDiffers25 ms30 ms
Surface hardnessKnown for one7H
Featuresidentical
VESA mountingKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMacOS
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one15000 h
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for oneDisplayPort + HDMI + VGA + USB Type-B
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneDC
AC adapter input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one4 A
AC adapter output voltageKnown for one12 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers170.2 mm35 mm
HeightDiffers16 mm241.1 mm
WeightDiffers656 g2.54 kg
WidthDiffers246.2 mm390.8 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package depthDiffers222.3 mm130 mm
Package heightDiffers69.9 mm360 mm
Package weightDiffers834 g3.82 kg
Package widthDiffers304.8 mm470 mm
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs5 - 35 °C0 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °C
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross heightKnown for one192 cm
Pallet gross lengthKnown for one100 cm
Pallet gross widthKnown for one120 cm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one1 pc(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCB, CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS
Certificatesidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneENERGY STAR
Sustainability complianceKnown for oneYes

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons