All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

Epson DM-D70 (111): USB Customer Display, Black vs iggual MTL21PX POS monitor

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 1identical
  • 33known for one product only

Key differences

The iggual MTL21PX POS monitor has 50 cd/m² more display brightness than the Epson DM-D70 (111): USB Customer Display, Black (250 cd/m² vs 200 cd/m²). The iggual MTL21PX POS monitor has 7 V more AC adapter output voltage than the Epson DM-D70 (111): USB Customer Display, Black (12 V vs 5 V). The Epson DM-D70 (111): USB Customer Display, Black has 64 mm more depth than the iggual MTL21PX POS monitor (100 mm vs 36 mm). Display diagonal: 17.8 cm (7") on the Epson DM-D70 (111): USB Customer Display, Black, 54.6 cm (21.5") on the iggual MTL21PX POS monitor. Display resolution: 128 x 38 pixels on the Epson DM-D70 (111): USB Customer Display, Black, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the iggual MTL21PX POS monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 17.8 cm (7")
    • 54.6 cm (21.5")
  • Display resolution
    • 128 x 38 pixels
    • 1920 x 1080 pixels
  • Display brightness
    • 200 cd/m²
    • 250 cd/m²
  • Interface
    • USB 2.0
    • VGA (D-Sub) + HDMI + USB 2.0
  • AC adapter input voltage
    • 5 V
    • 100 - 240 V
  • AC adapter output voltage
    • 5 V
    • 12 V
  • Depth
    • 100 mm
    • 36 mm
  • Height
    • 68 mm
    • 324 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
44 specifications
A

Epson

DM-D70 (111): USB Customer Display, Black

Model A61CH62111

View product
B

iggual

MTL21PX POS monitor

Model MTL21PX

View product
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers17.8 cm (7")54.6 cm (21.5")
Display resolutionDiffers128 x 38 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeKnown for oneFull HD
Display brightnessDiffers200 cd/m²250 cd/m²
TouchscreenKnown for oneYes
Touchscreen typeKnown for oneCapacitive
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one1000:1
Native aspect ratioKnown for one16:9
Native refresh rateKnown for one75 Hz
Number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million colours
Panel typeKnown for oneTFT-LCD
Response timeKnown for one5 ms
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one178°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one178°
Display typeKnown for oneLCD
Featuresidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneWindows 10, Windows 11, Windows 7, Windows 8
Country of originKnown for onePhilippines
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one43800 h
Ports & interfaces1 differ
InterfaceDiffersUSB 2.0VGA (D-Sub) + HDMI + USB 2.0
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1
Power2 differ
PowerKnown for one48 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one0.3 W
AC adapter frequencyKnown for one50/60 Hz
AC adapter input voltageDiffers5 V100 - 240 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one4 A
AC adapter output voltageDiffers5 V12 V
Energy consumption per 1000 hoursKnown for one15 kWh
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for oneF
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for oneE
Power source typeKnown for oneUSB
USB port voltageKnown for one5 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers100 mm36 mm
HeightDiffers68 mm324 mm
WeightDiffers930 g6 kg
WidthDiffers130 mm518 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 50 °C
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one228 mm
Package heightKnown for one165 mm
Package weightKnown for one1.26 kg
Package widthKnown for one228 mm
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross weightKnown for one0 g
Products per palletKnown for one140 pc(s)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons