Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

Capture CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor vs iiyama TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor

10specifications compared
8differ
2identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The iiyama TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor has 100 cd/m² more display brightness than the Capture CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor (450 cd/m² vs 350 cd/m²). The Capture CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor has 115 mm more package depth than the iiyama TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor (190 mm vs 75 mm). The Capture CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor has 125 mm more package height than the iiyama TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor (420 mm vs 295 mm). Display diagonal: 38.1 cm (15") on the Capture CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor, 39.6 cm (15.6") on the iiyama TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor. Display resolution: 1024 x 768 pixels on the Capture CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the iiyama TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor.

Display diagonal
- CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor:38.1 cm (15")
- TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor:39.6 cm (15.6")
Display resolution
- CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor:1024 x 768 pixels
- TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
Display brightness
- CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor:350 cd/m²
- TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor:450 cd/m²
Touchscreen type
- CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor:Capacitive
- TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor:Multi-user
Package depth
- CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor:190 mm
- TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor:75 mm
Package height
- CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor:420 mm
- TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor:295 mm
Package weight
- CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor:5.6 kg
- TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor:2.4 kg
Package width
- CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor:425 mm
- TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor:477 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CA-M6A-TOUCHMON, TW1523AS-B1P
31 specifications	A Capture CA-M6A-TOUCHMON POS monitor Model CA-M6A-TOUCHMON View product	B iiyama TW1523AS-B1P POS monitor Model TW1523AS-B1P View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	38.1 cm (15")	39.6 cm (15.6")
Display resolutionDiffers	1024 x 768 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Display brightnessDiffers	350 cd/m²	450 cd/m²
Touchscreen typeDiffers	Capacitive	Multi-user
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000:1
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Panel typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPS
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.17925 x 0.17925 mm
Response timeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 ms
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	170°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	170°
Display typeKnown for one	LCD	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Country of originKnown for one	China	Unknown — not stated by the source
Housing materialKnown for one	Aluminium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package depthDiffers	190 mm	75 mm
Package heightDiffers	420 mm	295 mm
Package weightDiffers	5.6 kg	2.4 kg
Package widthDiffers	425 mm	477 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 40 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-10 - 60 °C
Certificatesidentical
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for one	190 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	420 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	4.9 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	425 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons