All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

Capture 27-Inch Open Frame Touch AIO Computer vs Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 2identical
  • 30known for one product only

Key differences

The Capture 27-Inch Open Frame Touch AIO Computer has 725 mm more depth than the Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation (760 mm vs 35 mm). The Capture 27-Inch Open Frame Touch AIO Computer has 288.9 mm more height than the Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation (530 mm vs 241.1 mm). The Capture 27-Inch Open Frame Touch AIO Computer has 7.46 kg more weight than the Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation (10 kg vs 2.54 kg). Display diagonal: 68.6 cm (27") on the Capture 27-Inch Open Frame Touch AIO Computer, 39.6 cm (15.6") on the Viewsonic XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation.

  • Display diagonal
    • 68.6 cm (27")
    • 39.6 cm (15.6")
  • Depth
    • 760 mm
    • 35 mm
  • Height
    • 530 mm
    • 241.1 mm
  • Weight
    • 10 kg
    • 2.54 kg
  • Width
    • 160 mm
    • 390.8 mm
  • Package depth
    • 760 mm
    • 130 mm
  • Package height
    • 530 mm
    • 360 mm
  • Package weight
    • 12 kg
    • 3.82 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
41 specifications
A

Capture

27-Inch Open Frame Touch AIO ComputerView product
B

Viewsonic

XF1630 15.6” Open Frame Touch Monitor for 24/7 Continuous Operation

Model XF1630

View product
Display1 differ
Display diagonalDiffers68.6 cm (27")39.6 cm (15.6")
Display resolution1920 x 1080 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeKnown for oneFull HD
Display brightnessKnown for one187 cd/m²
TouchscreenKnown for oneYes
Touchscreen typeKnown for oneProjected Capacitive (PCAP)
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one800:1
Effective viewing areaKnown for one344.16 x 193.59 mm
Native aspect ratioKnown for one16:9
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.18 x 0.18 mm
Response timeKnown for one30 ms
Surface hardnessKnown for one7H
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one170°
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one170°
Featuresidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
VESA mountingKnown for oneYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneMacOS
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one15000 h
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for oneDisplayPort + HDMI + VGA + USB Type-B
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one1
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for oneDC
AC adapter input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 V
AC adapter output currentKnown for one4 A
AC adapter output voltageKnown for one12 V
Weight & dimensions4 differ
DepthDiffers760 mm35 mm
HeightDiffers530 mm241.1 mm
WeightDiffers10 kg2.54 kg
WidthDiffers160 mm390.8 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package depthDiffers760 mm130 mm
Package heightDiffers530 mm360 mm
Package weightDiffers12 kg3.82 kg
Package widthDiffers160 mm470 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one5 - 90%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 50 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °C
Logistics dataidentical
Pallet gross heightKnown for one192 cm
Pallet gross lengthKnown for one100 cm
Pallet gross widthKnown for one120 cm
Products per master (outer) caseKnown for one1 pc(s)
Technical detailsidentical
Compliance certificatesKnown for oneCB, CE, Federal Communications Commission (FCC), RoHS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons