Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

Acer ASV15-1BP POS monitor vs HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display

14specifications compared
10differ
4identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer ASV15-1BP POS monitor has 400 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display (1200:1 vs 800:1). The Acer ASV15-1BP POS monitor has 0.68 million colours more colours than the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display (16.78 million colours vs 16.1 million colours). The Acer ASV15-1BP POS monitor has 5 ms more response time than the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display (30 ms vs 25 ms). Display diagonal: 39.6 cm (15.6") on the Acer ASV15-1BP POS monitor, 25.6 cm (10.1") on the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display. Display resolution: 3840 x 2160 pixels on the Acer ASV15-1BP POS monitor, 1280 x 800 pixels on the HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display.

Display diagonal
- ASV15-1BP POS monitor:39.6 cm (15.6")
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:25.6 cm (10.1")
Display resolution
- ASV15-1BP POS monitor:3840 x 2160 pixels
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:1280 x 800 pixels
HD type
- ASV15-1BP POS monitor:4K Ultra HD
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:WXGA
Display type
- ASV15-1BP POS monitor:LED
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:IPS
Contrast ratio (typical)
- ASV15-1BP POS monitor:1200:1
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:800:1
Number of colours
- ASV15-1BP POS monitor:16.78 million colours
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:16.1 million colours
Response time
- ASV15-1BP POS monitor:30 ms
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:25 ms
Depth
- ASV15-1BP POS monitor:23.6 mm
- Engage One 10.1-inch Display:170.2 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ASV15-1BP, Engage One 10.1-inch Display
34 specifications	A Acer ASV15-1BP POS monitor Model ASV15-1BP View product	B HP Engage One 10.1-inch Display View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	39.6 cm (15.6")	25.6 cm (10.1")
Display resolutionDiffers	3840 x 2160 pixels	1280 x 800 pixels
HD typeDiffers	4K Ultra HD	WXGA
Display typeDiffers	LED	IPS
Display brightnessKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	500 cd/m²
TouchscreenKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1200:1	800:1
Effective viewing areaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	216.96 x 135.6 mm
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:10
Native refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 Hz
Number of coloursDiffers	16.78 million colours	16.1 million colours
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.1695 x 0.1695 mm
Response timeDiffers	30 ms	25 ms
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	5000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
Country of originKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	China
Ports & interfacesidentical
InterfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB Type-C
Poweridentical
Power source typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	USB
PowerKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
DepthDiffers	23.6 mm	170.2 mm
HeightDiffers	243.8 mm	35.2 mm
WeightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.49 kg
WidthDiffers	360 mm	246.2 mm
Packaging dataidentical
Package depthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	110 mm
Package heightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	232 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.93 kg
Package widthKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	306 mm
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 35 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-20 - 60 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons