Product comparison · 2 pos monitors

3MLCDM170CB POS monitor vs 3M MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor

Add a product
  • 9specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 2identical
  • 3known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 3MLCDM170CB POS monitor:43.2 cm (17")
    • MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor:38.1 cm (15")
  • Display resolution
    • 3MLCDM170CB POS monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor:1024 x 768 pixels
  • Display brightness
    • 3MLCDM170CB POS monitor:400 cd/m²
    • MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor:215 cd/m²
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 3MLCDM170CB POS monitor:450:1
    • MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor:350:1
  • Response time
    • 3MLCDM170CB POS monitor:16 ms
    • MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor:25 ms
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • 3MLCDM170CB POS monitor:160°
    • MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor:150°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • 3MLCDM170CB POS monitor:160°
    • MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor:135°

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 3MLCDM170CB, MicroTouch™ M150 15" LCD Touch Monitor
12 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers43.2 cm (17")38.1 cm (15")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1024 x 768 pixels
Display brightnessDiffers400 cd/m²215 cd/m²
TouchscreenYesYes
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs450:1350:1
Response timeDiffers16 ms25 ms
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers160°150°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers160°135°
Pixel pitchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.297 x 0.297 mm
Featuresidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one0 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one-20 - 60 °CUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More pos monitor comparisons

All pos monitor comparisons