Product comparison · 2 portable tvs & monitors

Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black vs Nilox NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black

15specifications compared
10differ
5identical
38known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black has 4 ms more response time than the Nilox NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black (8 ms vs 4 ms). The Nilox NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black has 8° more viewing angle, horizontal than the Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black (178° vs 170°). The Nilox NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black has 8° more viewing angle, vertical than the Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black (178° vs 170°). Display diagonal: 39.6 cm (15.6") on the Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black, 43.9 cm (17.3") on the Nilox NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black. Energy efficiency class (SDR): E on the Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black, C on the Nilox NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black.

Display diagonal
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:39.6 cm (15.6")
- NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black:43.9 cm (17.3")
Response time
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:8 ms
- NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black:4 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:170°
- NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black:178°
Viewing angle, vertical
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:170°
- NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black:178°
RMS rated power
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:2 W
- NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black:1 W
Energy efficiency class (SDR)
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:E
- NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black:C
Power consumption (standby)
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:0.5 W
- NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black:0.1 W
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:16 kWh
- NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black:6 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PD163QT, NXMP17FHD1441
53 specifications	A Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black Model PD163QT View product	B Nilox NXMP17FHD1441 portable TV/monitor Portable monitor Black Model NXMP17FHD1441 View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	39.6 cm (15.6")	43.9 cm (17.3")
Display technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LED
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Native refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	144 Hz
Response timeDiffers	8 ms	4 ms
Panel typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPS
PivotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
TouchscreenKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	170°	178°
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	30 - 70 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	58 - 62 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	100000000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	800:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
TV tuneridentical
Tuner typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Audio1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
RMS rated powerDiffers	2 W	1 W
Featuresidentical
SwivellingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Tilt adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Warranty periodKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 year(s)
VESA mountingKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	75 x 75 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power4 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Differs	E	C
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	C
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.5 W	0.1 W
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	16 kWh	6 kWh
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 kWh
Power source typeDiffers	AC	Battery
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	11 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	240.1 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.01 kg
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	392 mm
DepthKnown for one	22.7 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	216.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	2.5 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	355.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging content1 differ
Cables includedDiffers	AC, HDMI, USB Type-C	HDMI to Mini-HDMI, USB Type-C
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Remote control includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Technical detailsidentical
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	144 Hz
Storageidentical
Card reader integratedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB portKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB port typeKnown for one	USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable tvs & monitors comparisons

All portable tvs & monitors comparisons