Product comparison · 2 portable tvs & monitors

Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black vs Acer PM161QBbmiuux Portable monitor Black

21specifications compared
3differ
18identical
27known for one product only

Key differences

The Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black has 4 ms more response time than the Acer PM161QBbmiuux Portable monitor Black (8 ms vs 4 ms). The Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black has 7 kWh more energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours than the Acer PM161QBbmiuux Portable monitor Black (16 kWh vs 9 kWh). Energy efficiency class (SDR): E on the Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black, D on the Acer PM161QBbmiuux Portable monitor Black.

Response time
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:8 ms
- PM161QBbmiuux Portable monitor Black:4 ms
Energy efficiency class (SDR)
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:E
- PM161QBbmiuux Portable monitor Black:D
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hours
- PD163QT Portable monitor Black:16 kWh
- PM161QBbmiuux Portable monitor Black:9 kWh

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of PD163QT, PM161QBbmiuux
48 specifications	A Acer PD163QT Portable monitor Black Model PD163QT View product	B Acer PM161QBbmiuux Portable monitor Black Model PM161QBbmiuux View product
Display1 differ
Display technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Response timeDiffers	8 ms	4 ms
Display number of coloursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16.7 million colours
Colour gamut standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	NTSC
Panel typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IPS
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	30 - 70 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	58 - 62 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	800:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
AMD FreeSync typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	FreeSync
TV tuneridentical
Tuner typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Audioidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Featuresidentical
High Dynamic Range (HDR) supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
High Dynamic Range (HDR) technologyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	High Dynamic Range 10 (HDR10)
Tilt adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	45 - 60°
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Differs	E	D
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15 W
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	A to G
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursDiffers	16 kWh	9 kWh
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	0.5 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
DepthKnown for one	22.7 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HeightKnown for one	216.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
WeightKnown for one	2.5 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
WidthKnown for one	355.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	AC, HDMI, USB Type-C	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable tvs & monitors comparisons

All portable tvs & monitors comparisons