Product comparison · 2 portable stereo systems

Philips CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12 vs Philips AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital

22specifications compared
13differ
9identical
19known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12 has 10 W more RMS rated power than the Philips AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital (12 W vs 2 W). The Philips CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12 has 143 mm more package width than the Philips AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital (469 mm vs 326 mm). The Philips CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12 has 39 mm more package depth than the Philips AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital (197 mm vs 158 mm). Only the Philips CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12 has MP3 playback. Tuner type: Analog on the Philips CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12, Digital on the Philips AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital.

Tuner type
- CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12:Analog
- AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital:Digital
Supported radio bands
- CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12:FM
- AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital:DAB, DAB+
RMS rated power
- CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12:12 W
- AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital:2 W
MP3 playback
- CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12:Yes
- AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital:No
Product colour
- CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12:Black, Silver
- AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital:Black
Package width
- CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12:469 mm
- AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital:326 mm
Package depth
- CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12:197 mm
- AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital:158 mm
Package height
- CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12:311 mm
- AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital:275 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of AZ700T/12, AZB500B/12
41 specifications	A Philips CD Soundmachine AZ700T/12 Model AZ700T/12 View product	B Philips AZB500B/12 portable stereo system Digital Model AZB500B/12 View product
Radio2 differ
Tuner typeDiffers	Analog	Digital
Supported radio bandsDiffers	FM	DAB, DAB+
Preset stations quantityKnown for one	20	Unknown — not stated by the source
Optical driveidentical
Optical drive typeKnown for one	Player	Unknown — not stated by the source
Loudspeakers1 differ
RMS rated powerDiffers	12 W	2 W
Subwoofer driver diameter (imperial)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7.62 cm (3")
Audioidentical
Audio formats supportedKnown for one	MP3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Features2 differ
MP3 playbackDiffers	Yes	No
USB direct playbackKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Product colourDiffers	Black, Silver	Black
Bass reflexKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
FM antennaKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
AntennaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
FM radioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ports & interfacesidentical
Headphone outKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
AUX inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
BluetoothKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio inputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Poweridentical
Compatible battery sizesKnown for one	C	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220-240 V
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	469 mm	326 mm
Package depthDiffers	197 mm	158 mm
Package heightDiffers	311 mm	275 mm
Package weightDiffers	4.1 kg	2.4 kg
Weight & dimensions4 differ
WidthDiffers	435 mm	300 mm
DepthDiffers	271 mm	133 mm
HeightDiffers	170 mm	240 mm
WeightDiffers	2.9 kg	2 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Remote control includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Batteryidentical
Battery typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LR14

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More portable stereo system comparisons

All portable stereo system comparisons